Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Saints would have picked Hawk

Discussion in 'All Other Team Discussions' started by CaliforniaCheez, May 11, 2006.

  1. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Pro Football Talk has a article that said if Bush went #1 the Saints would have taken Hawk.

    MARIO WOULD HAVE FALLEN TO FOURTH

    Another intriguing nugget on which we recently stumbled was that defensive end Mario Williams expected in the days prior to the draft to be taken not by the Saints at No. 2, but by the Jets at No. 4.

    This expectation gave Williams an even greater incentive to ink a deal with the Texans to become the first overall pick.

    Most assumed that Williams would be drafted by the Saints at No. 2, if the Texans took Bush at No. 1. But we're now told that in the days prior to the draft, the Saints opted to focus on Hawk instead of Williams.

    So if the Texans had stayed with Bush, Hawk would have gone No. 2 to the Saints, Vince Young would have been taken at No. 3 by the Titans, Williams would have gone to the Jets at No. 4, and the Packers likely would have selected tackle D'Brickashaw Ferguson at No. 5.

    The Jets, we heard, would have tried to develop Williams into a Richard Seymour-type fixture in their new 3-4 scheme.
    **********************************************
    Well, Reggie helped the Packers. D'Brick might have been the LG instead of Colledge.
  2. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    D'Brick is a Tackle and doesn't fit the mold of a Guard. We would have had to (mistakenly I might add) move Clifton or Taush to guard :(
  3. DePack Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    3,904
    Location:
    Newark, Delaware
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    I think we may have traded down under this scenario.
  4. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Well......i think it worked out great for us! So i'm happy it went the way it did!
  5. smlutz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Message Count:
    331
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I concur cheesey.
  6. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Ferguson is 6' 5.5" and 310 lbs.

    Colledge is 6' 4.5" and 300 lbs.

    Very similar physically.
  7. kmac Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Message Count:
    849
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Except Ferguson has the quickness of the average 250 pound guy, and Colledge is just a solid athlete for his size.
  8. Hammer Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Message Count:
    651
    Location:
    Durham, NC
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    This is just chat fodder, but, I heard that Brick got his *** handed to him at the Senior Bowl. For what that's worth because I didn't see it and the media is always looking for chinks in the armor.
    Hammer
  9. NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,253
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Really??? I heard that D'Brick handed Mathias Kiwanuka's a$$ to him as well as others during the Senior Bowl. I didn't see it either though...
  10. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Colledge 40 time 5.04 or 4.98 depending on source.
    Ferguson 40 time 5.07 or 5.04 depending on source.

    My point is that you hear some criticisms over some of these guys and the items are rather minor. Some of the exagerations are over minor items also.

    The Packers were lucky Colledge was still on the board when then drafted again. His differences with Ferguson are not as great as the difference between Hawk and who was available at LB in the second round.

    Had the Packers drafted Ferguson he would be playing LG this year too.
  11. DePack Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    3,904
    Location:
    Newark, Delaware
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    40 times really have nothing to do with quickness for offensive linemen. I'd like to know what their 10 yard time is. I think they record that at the combine also.

Share This Page