Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Rodgers vs Favre do it here

Discussion in 'Smack Area' started by D.Levens, Sep 1, 2009.

  1. D.Levens Banned

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Message Count:
    167
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    You can call someone a "chicken" and a "douchebag", and make all the pathetiic "excuses" that you want for Mr. 31-33...but it doesn't change the fact that TT and AROD haven't accomplished sh*t yet...and once Favre and the Vikings kick their asses 2x this year, and the Pack finishes out of the running, it is you who will be the pathetic laughing stock of the NFL...

    Good luck with that!

    ha:jester:
  2. Green_Bay_Packers Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Message Count:
    5,629
    Location:
    Blackburn, England, United Kingdom
    Ratings Received:
    +109 / 1 / -0
    Lets just wait till they play when Rodgers has the best game of his career and favre has his worst :D
  3. 3irty1 Fear the Dreads!

    Member Since:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Message Count:
    895
    Ratings Received:
    +115 / 0 / -0
    OK, so i've been watching this debate for a lil while, and found it amusing. but now its getting PERSONAL! how DARE you say we'll be the laughing stock of the NFL, that is a cheap shot at the Lions who worked SO HARD for that honor, the packers aren't worthy of said title!
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    I see your little 7 day vacation didnt really do any good..So I took out your bad comments..

    Brett had the chance to bring a championship back home and he failed....:dontknow:

    Anyways as I heard on the OBF David had a few things to say about Brett not responsible for the Giants loss..

    I agree that Brett was not soley the reason they loss..as you and I have debated that before many factors went into that loss..Harris, Grant running for 28 yards ;)

    But then you and others on Bretts site NEVER EVER say anything other than Rodgers lost those 8 games last year.....

    Come on.... want to say there were other reasons as why the Giants game was lost, but pin all the losses on Rodgers last year

    EFFING double standards..

    I think your Brett googles are on way to tight..


    What do we know?

    #1...Brett was part of the reason the Ginats game was lost....

    #2...Rodgers was part of the reason why games were lost last year

    #3...Brett supporters can not and will not say Brett played any part in any loss

    #4...Brett supporters will ALWAYS blame Rodgers for any loss.

    #5...Do not trust a thing FFAN on Brett site says.They get proven wrong on a daily basis and still pretends like they know it all
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    I "Think"

    D.Levens is Bretts pilot..Or someone very closely related to him..

    He and his partners are the only ones that ever claimed that TT was gay..In fact the pilot was the 1st ever to mention it on Bretts official message board..

    When it was brought up by someone that a reason Ted hated Brett was cuz Ted over heard Brett called Ted a derogatory gay word. The pilot never denied it, but simply added fuel to the fire that Ted was gay.

    In fact when Brett retired the 1st time, the pilot said that in 3 years Brett would be on his tractor and Ted would be on an island somewhere with his "special friend"

    I have long suspected that D.Levens is someone closely related to the pilot, so this talk from him about Ted being gay puts another nail in the coffin in my theroy.

    So D.L unlike the site of the Brett supporters, we can debate here and as long as the name calling and nasty remarks can be held in check, you are welcome!!
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    Careful IM...

    I was was accused by the pilot of calling him a gay basher....That is one reason I left the site..He purposely lied to others about me..

    Pete had my account info and read all my pms to David...And verified to me that no way should David think I was calling him a gay basher. but there went David to try and sway the public opinion about me...

    Very clever on Davids part,to fabricate a lie to make himself look better..

    Brett taught him well????????????
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    no more talk now D.L??

    The thing you whined and cried like a school girl about, Rodgers was able to put a thumb in your mouth



    Or do I call your David?

    I see the Brett message board is already saying Rodgers did nothing

    and I quote
    LOL what a double standard.........

    Last year it was Rodgers cant win it at the end..

    He finally does with out a shadow of a doubt what your site asks and gives what you guys asked....and STILL wont give him credit


    Just a sad group of posters..
  4. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,942
    Ratings Received:
    +863 / 26 / -8
    @longtimefan-

    Agreed. Hell, Favre didn't do anything spectacular either. Simply showed up and handed the ball off.

    A win is a win. Glad we were able to get it done, no matter how sloppy. Lets hope we can fix our issues and get back on track.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    I am hearing that the pass Rodgers threw was nothing special, that Rodgers just had to pass it Jennings did all the work

    Yet those same people will say EXACT opposite when talking about Bretts pass to beat Denver few years ago..Or the pass to beat San Diego...


    I swear the Brett supporters have their tin foil hats on so tight, makes their brain not function properly
  5. Zeppelinelite51 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Message Count:
    225
    Ratings Received:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    That is very very weird... Favre did do that, however he openly admits he ran out of gas the second half the season (aside form the injury).

    And obviously your an idiot since 5 out of 6 games were decided by four points or less last season. Everyone (but you obviously) knows it was the Defense who could not finish last year, hence the reconstruction of it.

    and Im not worried about favre, prolly will get hurt b4 the pack play him. And if he doesnt he will prolly cough up a bunch of interceptions like he always seems to do. Adrian is who the packers will need to focus on primarily.

    Go Pack Go
  6. Murgen MechaPackzilla

    Member Since:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,273
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings Received:
    +570 / 0 / -0
    Roger ONLY had to get it to him. ONLY!??? Roger came from behind to win a TOUGH game.

    Sometime I wonder if the guys still holding Favre Jock Strap have a bunch of Favre memorabilia and don't want the prices to drop. LOL

    I think I could have beaten the Browns at QB with AP and the Vikes D. Favre did nothing special, but if you watch the News you would think he personally ran the ball for the TDs. Vikes beat a bad Browns team and all of a Sudden Favre is BACK to MVP form. Whatever.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    Shhhhhhhhh...

    No one can do it like Brett dontcha know
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    This is funny....


    Bretts pilot ( who I think is close to D.Levens) talking about the Giant's loss

    He is wrong as it was 28 yards and 40:01 sec..

    Yeah nit picking, but when you compare that game to the Tampa game it is important..

    I guess he forgot that in the Tampa game last year the Packers only rushed for 28 yards ( same as Giants ) and Tampa had ball for 36:50 minutes( 3 minutes and 11 secs less)..

    Yet Rodgers lost the game?

    Not to mention Tampa was on the road and Giants were at HOME



    Double standard much?
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    LOL they are now saying it was all Bretts doing to get that win..no one has even mentioned Lewis had to tight rope the line to make it count

    Again double standard

    Saying Rodgers did nothing but get Jennings the ball for the Bear win, but wont give any credit for Lewis to make the catch

    just SAD

    I can't wait for MNF
  7. Murgen MechaPackzilla

    Member Since:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,273
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings Received:
    +570 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, Favre tosses a desperation pass into basically a covered receiver who makes a hell of a great catch. The balls should have been picked off. But Favre gets the respect. FAVRE IS BACK, LORD FAVRE STILL HAS IT!!! What a bunch of crap. If he the receiver had dropped that everybody would be second guessing having him as their QB as they would be 2-1 and have struggled in their game against Detroit and San fran.

    I'll take Rogers over Favre at this point in their respective careers. Rogers has great opportunity in front of him. Favre is on his way out. If the Vikings really wanted to win a SB, they should have gone after Rogers, not through the Jet's trash dumpster and try to refurbish Favre.

    As soon as Minnesota faces a good opponent in the regular season or post season you'll see little Lord Favre try to win it and blow it all. Gonna be fun to watch that train wreck in Minnescrota. Favre looked like crap in the 49ers game, but got lucky at the end.

    Luck sometimes is better than skill.
  8. JeffQuery Banned

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    244
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Neither does Ted Thompson...

    Why anyone respects that egotistical douchebag is beyond me...

    Tauscher is working out for Kansas City, and do you think Teddyboy will sign him?

    Not a chance!

    Ted is too infatuated with young "boys"...

    (When are you guys going to catch on?)
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    Jeff, I have often wondered this.

    Give me proof of him having an ego

    If he wouldnt cut players he drafted or signed as free agents, then yeah maybe...But he has cut players like that more then a few times.

    Is it he comes out in the media and tells people this is how it is, umm yeah we know he doesnt do that...

    How about he NEVER allows players he acquired to be a main part of the team..MMM okay, Barnett, Kamp, Driver, Harris, Wells, all would disagree with that

    Is it he donest let loose of his plans on what they are going to do?? Maybe.. but isnt that just not letting your enemies know what your going to do?

    I guess maybe your not really being truthfull when you say he has an ego
  9. bad93ex Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Message Count:
    751
    Ratings Received:
    +7 / 0 / -0
    Everyone has downplayed Greg Lewis's catch but it was still a great throw as it was right where it was supposed to be for him to make the catch. Favre did show good poise in order to buy more time to complete the pass.

    Rodger's at this point and time is the better QB as far as skills but his book is only beginning where we are on the last chapter with Favre.
  10. JeffQuery Banned

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    244
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    You've (and many others) have been saying that crap for 5 years now!

    What if Rodgers never delivers and Thompson blew his last best chance by chasing Favre out of Green Bay.

    How will you feel then?

    How will you feel if Favre takes the Vikies all the way to the SB this year?
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    Answer my question before asking someone a different questuion:happy0005:
  11. ThinkICare Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Message Count:
    711
    Ratings Received:
    +15 / 0 / -0
    So, why will for some reason Brett Favre be better around December?


    Am I missing something?
  12. bad93ex Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Message Count:
    751
    Ratings Received:
    +7 / 0 / -0
    I vote for BAN because it is change we can believe in.

    Yes you hate TT but bring some facts to back up your argument.
  13. PackersRS Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    What if...
    What if Rodgers wins 3 SBs,
    What if gets voted MVP 4 times and
    What if the vikings finish with a losing season?

    What a dumb thing... Asking questions based on extremist hypotesis...
  14. JeffQuery Banned

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    244
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    I don't know.

    He's making an assumption that you are going to WIN WITH RODGERS..so.

    and LT, to answer your question.

    It's all relative.

    Ted Thompson has a big ego. You can see that just by the fact that he LOVES him some of his own draft picks, but does not want to sign "outside" or veteran guys, like Wolf did. Yeah...he's going to cut some of his own picks, and sign some of Sherman's...but if he didn't, he would be a TOTAL frickin' Homer, and would have been sent packing already....

    So it's not black or white, to my thinking.
  15. Quientus Oenophile

    Member Since:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Message Count:
    508
    Location:
    Denmark, Scandinavia
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1993
    There is no doubt that Aaron Rodgers is a very talented and gifted quarterback ... however ... Going from being talented to "full-fledge-star" are two very different things ... Some talented players (in any sports) never make that transition ... and "earn" the title "Eternal Talent" (not sure what you call it in english, so I translated a danish saying lol)

    Fact is:

    Favre "made it" from being "talented" into a "full-fledged-star" ...

    Rodgers is still making his way from being "talented" ... but not yet a "full-fledged-star" ...

    However, personally, I think it's time he earns his 60(?) million contract and start producing some more wins ...

    - IF the Packers end up with another losing season, I wonder if the media will be all over him like they currently are on Romo in Dallas ? Because in my view, Romo has actually produced something, since he started (as a "starter") as to compared to Rodgers, who is still having to "prove" his (real) worth imho ...

    Right now ... in my opinion Rodgers is NOT the better quarterback of the two ... - he still makes way too many mistakes that he (Rodgers) should know by now not to do (I'm referring to pocket awareness, reading the blitz, getting rid of the ball faster and also his seemingly(?) lack of periferal vision on the field) - and I'm one of those who believe that the WR corps of the Packers have also helped in making Rodgers stats better than what they really should be ...

    Will Rodgers become the better quarterback ? - Perhaps ... but not untill he weeds out those mistakes ...

    Now I'm not saying Favre doesn't make mistakes, because we all know he certainly does heh (part of why he is so interesting and fun to watch play), but right now Rodgers is in fact making more mistakes and mis-reads than Favre ... and currently that means Rodgers "loses" that match-up, and also because comparing those two at the current stage in either of their careers is kinda moot at this point ...

    And before other people start bringing up quarterback ratings ... - those are numbers and statistics, and as such, you can always bring up numbers that support any arguement ... In the end many years from now ... compare the wins vs loses (because those are what counts) and then we'll all be more the wiser ... (I seem to recall an "all time great" who never won a super-bowl ...)

    Personally what I would like to see is the quarterback ratings incorporating sacks and fumbles too ... because that would show a "better" (statistical) view than currently ... (like minus 2 points pr sack and minus 5 pr fumble - just an example)

    Just a few thoughts from Scandinavia ...

Share This Page