Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Redskins vs. Bucs..

Discussion in 'All Other Team Discussions' started by P@ck66, Jan 7, 2006.

  1. P@ck66 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -1
    Anybody watching this game?

    I can't believe that Tampa Bay didn't challenge that call where they sacked Brunnell and recovered the ball in the endzone...

    That looked like a fumble to me..!

    (and the morons on ESPN didn't even catch it..or say anything about it...)

    Unbelievable!
  2. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    Watching it now.
  3. arrowgargantuan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,644
    Location:
    San Jose, Ca.
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    thats what bugs me the most...watch the game guys, it's your f'ing job.
  4. PackerChick Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    3,143
    Location:
    Ashland, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    The game was on ABC.
  5. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    abc and espn use the same announcers
  6. all about da packers Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    7,033
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Yeah it was on ABC, but it wasn't Madden or Michals. It was some second rate announcing team that was just bad. Made the game harder to follow.

    Amazing part was when the ref explained the reason a pass was incomplete upon further review, then one announcer came in and repeated the exact words in easier vocabulary, and the other guys were astonished at his knowledge and congratulated him on knowing the game so well. Honestly, I don't think they were listening to themselves or each other almost the entire game.
  7. packerfan4ever Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,010
    Location:
    wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +41 / 3 / -0
    i thought it a good game,but tampa just couldnt come out and play all the things simms said they should'nt do they did,turn the ball over fumble interception,that is what cost them the game.
  8. NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,253
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Wow..the Redskins pulled out a road playoff game while amassing an astounding 120 yards on offense. I'm sorry but their playoff lives will be short-lived if they expect their defense to carry the load to that extent.
  9. gotarace27 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    316
    Location:
    northcentral wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Have to agree with you ndpack but hell isn't that exactly what the Bears are planning to do? :D
  10. NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,253
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, I think so gota...might get them one win in the playoffs but won't get them to the big show IMO.
  11. all about da packers Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    7,033
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Let's not forget the Ravens. They won with D, and below average O. But Washington has playmakers, and Burnell has shown that he can explode at any time. So you never know.
  12. NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,253
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    The point is, the Redskins totaled 120 yards. I think the Ravens were still gaining more yards than that with Jamal Lewis and Co. Nobody here is saying the Redskins can't explode as you say...just saying that at 120 yards, they will not last long.
  13. arrowgargantuan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,644
    Location:
    San Jose, Ca.
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    not to mention, we shouldn't be comparing the 2001 Raven's D with this Redskins unit. thats kind of disrespectful imo..
  14. all about da packers Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    7,033
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Yeah I do agree Arrow, but the WAshington D is excellent (not the best). And yeah 120 yards will not cut it at all.

Share This Page