Ramblings by MNVIKES4EVAR

I didn't hate him until I found out he wanted to play for the Queens. He'd have been better off joining the Communist Party as far as most of us are concerned.

I fin dit interesting that you are here on a Packer board with a hockey avatar. Maybe you should focus on dealing with South Dakota. :viksux:

61 years is a long time in the NFL. The Queens have pretty much sucked since we let them in the league because of their weakling fan base.... which is more like a mud puddle than a base. I attended all of their playoffs at the Met for $5-$10 since their "fans" didn't want to go. Ditto Goofer tickets. Universal losers.

You'd think they'd be too busy marching on Brewster/Childress to frick around here.

But I gotta admit, I love Brewster/Childress.

Bring it. lol:viksux:

Wow, clueless much? Better off joining the communist party? Ok, in his first year with the Vikes he set his ALL-TIME best season statistically, and yes at 40 yrs old. Second, the Vikings beat your lovely Packers not once, but BOTH TIMES last year, so yeah, I am guessing he is pretty happy he came to the Vikes, and from the looks of things, it was the better team OVERALL last year as well. This year, well we will soon find out who is the better team...

South Dakota? Why, it's not like Sconny has an NHL team, and just for your information, IF you include pre-ncaa championships, the Gophers have won more than the Badgers. IF you don't count those, then they are only one shy of the Badgers...so what the hell does SD have to do with anything? Also, can't someone enjoy watching, playing, and cheering for two different sports? Is that against the law in Wisconsin where you live? Didn't think it was so shut it.....How about them Brewers? Yeah, they are ONCE AGAIN nowhere near as good as the Twins (who are the 2nd best team in all of the MLB right now). How many world series has the Brew Crew won again? AND, Gopher hockey has 2 more championships than the Badgers (if counting the pre-ncaa ones), but if not, they are only one shy.

AND who are you referring to as "letting the Vikes into the league", don't go getting all cocky on me....you nor your team have done squat in letting anyone into the league, so you can take that BS and shove it you know where....ridiculous....The Vikings actually have a very good fanbase if you ask me, especially after all these years where they haven't won a superbowl, to me that is pretty impressive, goes to show that MANY won't give up even though there are no trophy's in their case....but you wouldn't know what that's like now would ya? Nope, what your case consists of is **** more than 40 yrs old, some of it 50.....that time is LONG GONE bud....these days you haven't even come close to earning a new one, not for the last 15 yrs...so all those antiques aren't doing the Pack jack squat now are they?

NICE! So automatically my posts are "ramblings" simply because I am a Vikings fan? How about the equal amount of replies by Packer fans in the link you provided? Those better as hell be ramblings too then, otherwise you sir have just demonstrated that your one crappy admin, picking and choosing quality of comments/posts based on the poster alone....WTF?

And, the name is MNVIKES4EVA, NOT MNVIKES4EVAR....but you should know that by now since you have personally picked me out of the entire group and decided to clarify my posts as "not good enough", or "ramblings as you put it" right? It couldn't be that every other person that took part in my posts "including you" were justified and worthy, but me on the other hand isn't anywhere close....

Actually, why even delete them at all? What is the problem with leaving them up? Everyone on here should be a grown up (i.e. able to sift through whatever they don't want to read anyway) right? I post how I feel and/or think as a Viking/Favre fan, and you Packer fans turn around and disagree, that is what a message board is all about, people with different ideas/opinions/thoughts/whatever. It's funny how nobody on here is a Packer fan has been "called out" like myself, and you say the boards are welcome to anyone...what a joke.

Put down your crack pipe and slowly back away. If you have been on this forum for more than 3 days and have read threads.........you would know that people get called out all the time. We try.........and I said TRY......to at least give each other respect while posting. But the BS you are throwig out there arguing with people who know the Packers......and FAVRE is crazy. Favre is suppose to be the Vikings savior according to the Fans in Minnesota or wherever. WE know Favre. So you are not going to come here and be able to convince us........that Favre is anything other than ......what he is.

I have been called out.........and so has just about everyone else on here. We argue our points and sometimes just agree that we disagree. Chill out dude!!!

I cant blame minnesotans too much for their praises of favre, i mean theyve NEVER had a halfway decent QB, so theyre ecstatic, even though this one is well past his prime

Actually, Vikings had a couple of good ones. A fran Tarkenton and a Joe Capp come to mind.
In the days of Capp, The Vikings were a super team. They had the right QB and the right coach and they went to the superbowl.

The recent versions of the Vikings have been pukey.

The 40 year old 1 for 2 in superbowls QB is like a goldmine for the 0 for 4 Chokequeens. C'mon man, what else do they have to cheer for? LOL

The Packers were absolutely terrible until Favre arrived. Absolutely pathetic. From 1970-1991, they had a grand total of 3 winning seasons. And with one of those being due to a tie (an 8-7-1 record in 1978). Oh, unless you count the strike shortened season of 1982, which your scrub/replacement players posting a 5-3-1 record. I guess you can hang your hat on that. As soon as Favre took over in 1992 (after another pathetic season, 4-12 record in 1991), the Packers started posting winning records every season, except 1 (8-8 record in 1999). Now I want to be fair and give the Packers credit for last year with Aaron Rogers (even though the Vikings whipped them twice, and they lost the wild-card game, giving up 51 points). He might be able to keep the Packers from falling back to their usual non-Favre level. But I need to see it for a few years before I'm convinced. After all, they said the same thing about Don Majkowski, and look at how well that turned out.

So uh as long as you want to talk history, how about we check on how many titles you guys have? or is that a sore subject

Yesterday's game performances by Rodgers and Favre make this thread both amusing and ironic.

Favre took over?

What do you think he was coach or GM? He is just one player on a team.

C'mon man.

There. Corrected it for you.

So let me get this straight. Favre is SO good, that he singlehandedly brought the Packers back to greatness. Hell, maybe he is; but if he is SO good, and the 'Queens look SO bad, what does that say for the rest of your team? If they can drag down the great Brett Favre, they must be the suckiest sucks that ever sucked. Which seems totally reasonable and logical.

This whole thread is going to really be getting some laughs when the Vikings get beat by Detroit Sunday!

gotta love viking fans that join packer sites just to talk sh*t....

go queens 0-3 here we come!

Classic!

HA! And you Packer fans call the Vikings fan-base wishy-washy (Hypocrites anyone), you aren't any better guys, admit it! All I see on these boards is how AFRAID and NERVOUS everyone is regarding the Packers season now that they finally played a REAL TEAM! Ha, the Eagles had not yet found their identity when you played them (Vick coming in for Kolb thing), and the Bills are a disgrace, the only reason why they played well against NE this past week is because they got rid of Trent Edwards, whom was the QB when you played them.

Good point here, now that your running game sucks, and your discipline in terms of coaching is virtually non-existent, the Pack are not considered dominant anymore. In all honesty, I knew the whole time they weren't, 2-0 after beating two crap teams shouldn't speak the season for any team, nor overall talent level. It's just like the Vikes last year with their first 2-3 games, looked great, but only because of who the challengers were....

I see the Vikings sneaking right up on the Pack the next few weeks, as long as the defense continues to play well and Peterson keeps up his beastly games. Oh yeah, just for all you Favre lovers....5 picks in 3 games, but only 3 of them were put ALL on him, otherwise 2 of them were deflected as he threw the ball (i.e. offensive line blows aka Phil Loadholt)...Rodgers now has 3 as well...not so bad when you look at the "totality of circumstances" meaning the Vikes have only 2 decent receivers for Favre to utilize at this point; one being Percy and the other being a TE in Shaincoe.

Another thing, don't get too comfortable with the Detroit game this week, I bet many GB fans are thinking this is their rebound week, however Detroit could easily be 2-1, they are a much improved team from last year and the Vikings were the first team to put a game out of reach yet this season. Also, any team that is 0-3 will DO ANYTHING to get a win, don't write them off quite yet, I would be careful with any betting this week if you are putting a lot of stock into the Packers, their defensive line is real good, and you all know how well Rodgers does with pressure constantly throughout the game....lol..he holds onto the ball too long IMO. Good thing he can scramble, but that won't be his life savor this week, however it will help

there is so much trolling in this post its unbelievable...

first off, the thing you quoted isnt being "wishy washy" its being pissed at the retarded mistakes that were made all night in an extremely frustrating game to watch. being wishy washy would be saying we have the greatest team ever sunday night then talking about how terrible we are now, atleast IMO.

No one is afraid or nervous, i have no idea where your getting that idea from, like i said already everyone is frustrated over how we beat ourselves in a game we should have won easily.

Not dominant anymore? wtf? the bears didnt beat us last night, we beat ourselves, other than that we were pretty dominant. Maybe some of us fans were guilty of crowning ourselves NFC champs but lets look at this realistically. Bears, rival game, on the road, no shame in losing this one. the fact that they should have won makes it hurt more. Not to mention the fact that the Bears are now the only 3-0 team in the NFC. would you call them dominant? i sure wouldnt. We're 3 games into the season bud, no one is "dominant"

Come on, none of us are gonna care how many Favre interceptions "werent his fall" they all count the same. but im sure many packer fans are gonna tell you Rodgers interception last night was a dumb hail Mary play.

The Lions? if we lose to the Lions i will never watch another Packers game again. They suck...you know it, i know it. they're 0-3 very desperate for that win right? just like the year they didnt win a game, that desperation really helped right? if you suck, which the Lions do, then they arent gonna win. oh and 22 straight road loses is a stat id like to bring up too.

Bold = extreme troll

First off, there is nothing wrong with trolling, and for all of those "highlighted" sentences, those are simply a mix of facts, opinions, and suggestions, plain and simple, so stop acting like everything I wrote was automatically bullshit and untrue because I happen to be a Vikings fan ok? Thanks....

Second, Comparing a pass play, failed route by a receiver, etc is one thing, but when your offensive line continuously let's defenders through who "occasionally" get a piece of the QB while throwing (which is what I am referring to) is different in nature. If you would like to mention QB INT in regards to crap play calls and all that, well I wouldn't be defending any QB because of that, but when a defender get's a piece of a QB while throwing, and the ball ends up getting intercepted I put more on the line the majority of the time versus the QB, especially when the linemen lets a defender through right away like Phil Loadhoalt and Bryant McKinnie do all the time...go look at how many times Favre has been sacked with the Vikes and Jets, it's insanely higher compared to when he played with the Pack (i.e. better O-Line)...

Third, the Lions suck? Ok, they nearly beat the Eagles (put up 32 points actually), and could have easily won if it weren't for a last minute BS play. They ONLY lost to the Bears IN CHICAGO by 4 pts, and only allowed the Bears to score 19pts, but another game which they could have won if it weren't for one or two bad plays. Admit it, the Lions are much better team than people give them credit for (at least this year), they have a great defensive line and a good running game (Vikings shut it down however). If they at least had Stafford in their playing, they would be that much better. I am telling you, Detroit will put up a fight and quite possibly might get their first win against the Pack at home, they are hungry for their first and me and you know how dangerous it is when a team is winless! Don't get to worked up if Detroit ends up winning, they are due!

lol, there is alot wrong with trolling, and the bolded statements were blatant acts of trolling. which apparently you dont know what it means so ill enlighten you. Its purposely antagonizing other people on the forum, and statements like "i never thought you were dominant" is obviously going to stir up a negative response from Packer fans.

and sorry i dont watch viking games so all i see are his total number of interceptions. ill agree with you in that clearly they werent all this fault but still they count and thats all that it comes down to, for any quarterback.

and alright maybe im not giving the Lions enough credit, but still i see they are 0-3, an injured quarterback, but a strong defensive line. I still dont think the Packers will have any trouble with them at home though.

I am not trying to piss people off dude, but rather am giving a perspective that is from a Vikings fan. Am I going around calling people names and claiming the packers suck right? (except their running game at this time which EVERYONE would agree with) Of course ANY fan can get worked up when you point out things in a different light, it's called "change" and "difference". More often than not people will respond negatively simply because someone disagrees, so don't go around thinking just because I have a different point of view I am trolling, that is just your instincts playing games on ya....end of story.

Way to go Bears! Seriously, Jim Rome read an email today from a Packer Fan that said "hey we needed that wake up call!" Rome laughed just like us "ex-Packer fans". It's simple--the Pack played one of their worst games ever. It has been sickening watching how McCarthy and Rodgers massage each others egos. It is really rewarding to see you Packer fans in misery---you should be ashamed of all of the bad mouthing; back slashing you have done on Favre. I am one cheesehead that is proud to say the Packers disgust me. And your precious McCarthy--didn't have the balls to say he made a mistake last night. He will never own up to making mistakes. The Packers deserve him, Thompson and Rodgers!!!!!