1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up/a> or Log In

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

Psssst, It's STILL just the Pre-season....

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by IPBprez, Aug 28, 2005.

  1. IPBprez
    Offline

    IPBprez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,883
    Location:
    Lambeau Midwest
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0
    I've read on about what Tromadz and Az's posting for Chris Havel at PackersNews all think... and they are certainly good "valid" contention points.... seriously! But - Read this......

    PackerNation Perspective (of PackerChatters Fame)

    New England Post-Mortem
    August 28,2005

    I viewed nearly all the first half of the game at Fatso
  2. Anubis
    Offline

    Anubis Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Messages:
    767
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I question the author's opinion that GB does not possess an "elite" offence. While what happens this season remains to be seen, last season they finished as the 3rd top offence in the league. If that in itself does not define them as elite, I have no idea what will. The combination of Favre, Green, Walker and Franks is going to add up to a lot of points no matter which way you try to slice it.

    GO PACK!

    Robert C. Hedley
  3. Zero2Cool
    Offline

    Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,902
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings:
    +7 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    OMFG THE PACKERS CAN'T MAKE THE PLAYOFFS NOW im gonna eat bleach and die they lost to the pathetic back to back nfl champions!!
  4. CalifPacker
    Offline

    CalifPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    757
    Location:
    California Gold
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    I agree with you, Anubis. This group can put a lot of points on the board.
  5. vixtalkn
    Offline

    vixtalkn Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    197
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
  6. CaliforniaCheez
    Offline

    CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I seem to remember a lot of coaches wanting players to practice hard for the next game. They always seemed to thing that how you prepare was important.

    The argument that things are not too bad should be that Rodgers sucked up too many minutes of each game. He sucked when he sucked up those minutes.

    19.4 Passer Rating. Now if we had our better QB back ups playing we might have had a few first downs.

    How else do you explain the lack of points scored by the Packers?

    Rodgers spot on the bench could have been taken by Hunt while Hunt's replacement played.
  7. IPBprez
    Offline

    IPBprez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,883
    Location:
    Lambeau Midwest
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0
  8. agopackgo4
    Offline

    agopackgo4 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,365
    Location:
    Wausau WI
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I really think that Lennon is going to fit better than Navies
  9. Zero2Cool
    Offline

    Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,902
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings:
    +7 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    None of US ...
  10. tromadz
    Offline

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Lenon will be better than Navies, but that itself isn't saying too much at all. Navies was bad. He was one of the reasons that side of the field gave up some big runs.

Share This Page