1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

Packers select richard Rodgers

Discussion in 'Draft Talk' started by ivo610, May 9, 2014.

  1. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    15,151
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings:
    +3,607 / 92 / -35
    A need. Don't know much bout him
  2. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,956
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 24 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    [​IMG]

    I personally know nothing about him but his dad is infamous.


    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. FrankRizzo
    Offline

    FrankRizzo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,868
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings:
    +1,667 / 62 / -35
    Packer Fan Since:
    1969
    I wanted Crockett Gilmore, who went the next pick... perfect.
  4. brandon2348
    Offline

    brandon2348 GO PACK GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    705
    Ratings:
    +167 / 17 / -0
    He has upside. Most likely going to need some work. Some compare him to Antonio Gates type TE. Has basketball background. Overall good athlete and coming out early as a junior. I like him and had him in my mock in 6th round. Not sure how he jumped to 3rd.
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. thequick12
    Offline

    thequick12 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2014
    Messages:
    133
    Ratings:
    +29 / 7 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992
    TT is a joke with his best player available line
  6. brandon2348
    Offline

    brandon2348 GO PACK GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    705
    Ratings:
    +167 / 17 / -0
    Yeah. This appears to be a reach if ever.
  7. brandon2348
    Offline

    brandon2348 GO PACK GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    705
    Ratings:
    +167 / 17 / -0
    Total reach. If TT wanted a tight end so bad then why didn't he trade up 2 spots to get Niklas. This is a total "head scracher"
  8. HardRightEdge
    Offline

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,242
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings:
    +1,390 / 70 / -7
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    Kinda slow in college playing at 245. Very slow at the combine and 257. Maybe they like him for an in-line blocking TE?

    I don't get this pick.
  9. brandon2348
    Offline

    brandon2348 GO PACK GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    705
    Ratings:
    +167 / 17 / -0
    Total reach. If TT wanted a tight end so bad then why didn't he trade up 2 spots to get Niklas. This is a total "head scratcher"
    Last edited: May 9, 2014
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. PackerFlatLander
    Offline

    PackerFlatLander Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 27, 2013
    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    Bloomingdale, IL
    Ratings:
    +286 / 7 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1982
    Typically, when two players on the team have the same last name, they both have their first name initial on the jersey nameplate. However, I can't see Aaron Rodgers out there with A. Rodgers on his nameplate. I hope Richard doesn't mind R. Rodgers on his, because that's probably what will happen. Seems like somewhat of a project pick, but was no doubt a need. Pretty happy so far after four picks. Was kinda hoping for a franchise center, but maybe Ted find one tomorrow.
  11. Pacal
    Offline

    Pacal Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    125
    Ratings:
    +41 / 1 / -0

    Is that a Packers thing?

    Because I thought the initial thing was eliminated league-wide. At least it was in the case of the 49ers when they had Alex Smith, Aldon Smith and Justin Smith.


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. Vrill
    Offline

    Vrill Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    207
    Ratings:
    +80 / 2 / -0
    I can get behind the other picks we made, but this one was a head scratcher to me. I know we needed a TE, but I think TT reached here for this player.

    We'll see though. Time will tell.
  13. rodell330
    Offline

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,467
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +835 / 177 / -43
    Packer Fan Since:
    1990
    Just special teams guys at this point with no real immediate impact. TT is losing with these picks..only one of these guys will probably contribute.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  14. jaybadger82
    Offline

    jaybadger82 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    764
    Ratings:
    +346 / 20 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992
    Thornton was stupefying. This one is infuriating.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. rodell330
    Offline

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,467
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +835 / 177 / -43
    Packer Fan Since:
    1990
    Watched all the highlights and I see a guy who went way earlier then he should have. There's absolutely nothing he does that gets me excited and he's slow. He basically wasted 3rd rd pick for a special teams guy.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Einstein McFly
    Offline

    Einstein McFly Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    Messages:
    310
    Ratings:
    +200 / 10 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1988
    A lot of run blocking against Standford in a blowout, some of it not so bad. A lot in the slot against Washington. Seems like a more "versatile" guy than the first three TEs taken, but not the blocker than Niklas or CJF from Iowa. We'll have to see. It sounds like he didn't really have much of a chance to thrive in college. TT must think he has a high ceiling or something.
  17. jaybadger82
    Offline

    jaybadger82 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    764
    Ratings:
    +346 / 20 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992
    Looks a lot like reaching for need to me. ****.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. PackerFlatLander
    Offline

    PackerFlatLander Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 27, 2013
    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    Bloomingdale, IL
    Ratings:
    +286 / 7 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1982
    Good point. I guess it's the team's call. Smith is far more common than Rodgers, but you're right - they'll probably just put the last name on both. The number is the difference.
  19. PackerFlatLander
    Offline

    PackerFlatLander Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 27, 2013
    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    Bloomingdale, IL
    Ratings:
    +286 / 7 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1982
    Eh, I wouldn't go that far, man. Ted Thompson rarely ever bombs on offensive skill position players. His track record with receivers and tight ends and the offense they play in ... it speaks for itself. No way can I hate this pick. As I said before, he's probably a project player going in, but regardless - with the Finley situation being what it is, he pretty much had to get another TE. Ordinarily, on others teams, I'd call this a reach. But on the Packers, probably not. Time will tell.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. MiamiBeachPacker
    Offline

    MiamiBeachPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Messages:
    544
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Ratings:
    +214 / 15 / -0
    Should probably wait to see him actually play for the Packers before declaring this pick a failure or reach.
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  21. rodell330
    Offline

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,467
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +835 / 177 / -43
    Packer Fan Since:
    1990
    I suppose so ... We can revisit this thread In the future.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. GoPGo
    Offline

    GoPGo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,092
    Ratings:
    +507 / 93 / -15
    Packer Fan Since:
    1970
    Ted has a pretty good track record with guys named "Rodgers" who played for Cal.
    • Funny Funny x 1
  23. GoPGo
    Offline

    GoPGo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,092
    Ratings:
    +507 / 93 / -15
    Packer Fan Since:
    1970
    And give up an extra pick to move those two spots? No thanks.
  24. brandon2348
    Offline

    brandon2348 GO PACK GO!

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    705
    Ratings:
    +167 / 17 / -0
    I thought this guy would of been a possible steal in
    Last edited: May 9, 2014
  25. ExpatPacker
    Offline

    ExpatPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,089
    Location:
    A Galaxy Far, Far Away
    Ratings:
    +394 / 7 / -0
    This pick really does seem like a waste. Antonio Richardson at OT, Pierre Desir at CB are two I could have seen. Rogers is nothing more than a developmental pick, and developmental picks are destined for the Practice Squad.

    Ha-Ha was a fine pick in round 1. I'm ok with Davante Adams in round 2, but in round 3 Packers sure did pass on some good players.
    • Agree Agree x 3

Share This Page