Hauschild...
Do you have a reading/comprehension problem? I don't want to disparage someone who has a legitimate learning disability but at no time did I ever say "I have no problem with bringing a convicted felon on board".
That's just either pure fabrication on your part or some kind of reading comprehension problem. I don't know which.
I have a lot of problems with Vick, but not because he's a convicted felon. I actually think your remark of
This should be concerning to any law-abiding American.
is a bunch of sanctimonious bologna. Our President declared his candidacy in the living room of a guy who bombed the Pentagon. He's admitted using cocaine. Don King is a convicted murderer. Tim (the Tool Man) Allen is a convicted felon.
And then, of course, there are the legions of us who've actually broken the law and not been caught.
America is a nation which believes in redemption and in giving a second chance to people, even when it isn't really warranted. The alternative to giving a chance to convicts who've served their sentence is to not release them, ever. I mean, he did the crime and he did the time. Once upon a time that was known as "paying your debt to society".
But you want to continue to treat him like a pariah. For what purpose? How does it benefit anyone to continue to deny him an opportunity to work in his field?
The NFL has people in it right now who are convicted drug users (and even dealers), wife-beaters, drunken drivers, etc. Ray Lewis was neck-deep in a double murder and the cover-up.
But no, Vick was mean to dogs so he should just be punished to the grave and beyond, right? Not in my book, not in my country. He should....and I think will....be given a chance (probably with the Ravens).
I have issues with having Vick on the Packers, but not because he's a convicted felon. I just think he's not a good guy and IMO I'd rather lose with men of good character than win with thugs. I know others don't agree but that's their prerogative.