Packers cut Chatman

check the link:

Web Page Name

I really liked him, he gave all on every play, he never fumbled any punt, he even get some very good receptions,,,, but MM likes big targets and it is his call. What about big hearted targets? If he likes them he will need to cut big sized, big mouth, small heart Fergy too. Chatman had much better numbers tha Fergy´s

Well if he cuts useless Fergy, maybe better if he trades him for a six pack of Corona Beer I will be satisfied.

I remember once that Bruce refering to Chatman used this Mark Twain quote "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog".

Well MM now you have to find big targets, with bigger hearts, and bigger fights inside !!!!!! You are setting your standards my friend !!!

WTF?

Why did we cut Chatman?

Why did we keep Ferguson?

1. Chatman didn't drop a single pass
2. He was a decent returner
3. Chatman was one of our best receivers last season

This is not good news

I really liked Chatman, and I hate fergy.

If he likes big physical guys scratch draft williams out of Wisconsin. MM must be pretty dunce you do need someone on the return teams

See,,,,, good to hear I not the only one !!!

We need a small guy for the returner job, I think they might get Brandon Williams for that.

Hank Baskett seems to be pretty interesting if he falls a little in the draft, maybe to the 3rd round if we're lucky, anyone think he can fall that far?

AND FOR THE LOVE OF GOD why would you not cut Fergy first he has shown absolutely nothing to the Packers. No skill no desire.

I agree, but I think they want to trade Fergy, he might still have some value!

Yeah maybe in a strict ball control offense that does not require a guy to fight for the ball

hehehe, I think we will trade him to da stinkin' bears for some draft picks

fergy...value?!? He's injury prone, soft, and hasn't done anything in the last 2 years

Chatman isn't the ultimate answer, but as others have said, I hate seeing someone like him cut loose...you can't tell me he can't be the #4 wr for the pack next year!

I honestly dont think so

1 you never trade to a divisional opponent
2 why would they want him they see him twice every year and he sucks more likely the bears would pick up chatman

1. It would be a good draft, we get picks they get a sucky receiver
2. They are stupid

Disappointing. Hopefully it is just some kind of salary cap move. I wouldn't mind seeing somebody beat Chatman out in training camp for that punt returner/#4 receiver job, but I think he at least deserves to battle for the job.

well he isn't even going to be in the battle it seems..

i really believe we did this because we will pick up a reciever in free agency

It's time to start discussing who we will pick up,
might I guess, Antwaan Randle El?

I would love to see him in the green and gold!

He's a return guy too!

btw... I just became a platinum supporter

well we do need a returner now so he could be a good option. or possibly brandon lloyd. he was on the 49ers with mcarthy and hes pretty good

I really don't see why we cut Chatman if we're going to sign Lloyd. He's not that much bigger than Chatman.

We will probably sign Gardner. I don't blame Ferguson for being injury prone and what I read he did work hard. Just a really bad pick when we could have had Chambers and I said that at the time. But I really don't understand cutting Chatman. He will get picked up.

I hope the Vikings don't pick him up, he's a packers guy

Another one of Mike Sherman's guys gone.
This is TT's team now, nobody is safe.
Goodluck to Antonio, one muffed punt in 3 years, 0 fumbles,
and a heck of a 4th reciever, he will land on his feet somewnere.

He will be remembered as one of the bright spots in a dark season

Still would have been better served to pick up the option and then shop him for a 4th round pick or something like it. Pretty stupid to just let him go