Pack takes Nick Collins

Fact is, if those 'expert mock draft' people were in fact, experts they'd have been hired to a NFL team instead of publishing 'mock' drafts.

No doubt, professional NFL types and so called draft experts have hit on a few and missed more than probably any of them would care to admit. However, some of you seem to imply that even the good/credible mock drafts are nothing more than a bunch of writers sitting around pulling names out of a hat. I don't care what analyst you like or don't like, there usually is a consensus on the top college players by everyone concerned. Usually everyone in the College/NFL circle is in agreement on whom the first day players are and who should be available on the 2nd Day. I think it's safe to say GB/TT reached in almost every rd for players he could have had later on, and to make matters worst, TT took a number of guys w/ health and character concerns from small/un-NFL type programs....guys who will need some time to develop and mature. I don't think GB had that luxury this year. They needed to hit on 4 players in the top 89 who could step in and contribute and maybe start right away. Most people around the NFL don't believe they had that type of draft nor do I. Time will tell; I hope I am wrong! I want #4 to go out on top and I am pissed because I don't think GB is doing all it can to ensure that happens.

With that type of support, you are a true backer of the Packers.

Where are all the fans who trust the PROFESSIONALS until proven otherwise? I know ya round here somewheres, just has to be some!

questioning how he develops his opinion of the team, and his support of the team, are 2 very different things.

he might be screaming louder than you on sundays...

I yell, girls scream.

no...girls whine ^^^^^

You make as much sense as a $3 bill.

that wasn't hard to understand...grasshopper.

Yep, jus tossed that aside as another lameduck come back.

i care tons.

Your repeated posting has proved such.

where or where did the topic go?

fftopic:

So who contributes more this year, Underwood or Collins?

Underwood I don't see Collins playing a whole lot.

Apparently other GM's call Thompson to congratulate him after taking Underwood. I'll just be happy when either one takes Roman's roster spot.

<sarcasm>As we all know how accurate it is to real life</sarcasm>: God Roman sucks in Madden.

Yep - looks like a direct challenge to Collins, I'd say!

This Bates has me excited about our defense this year. I hope these guys pan out and kick bootay!

Oh, ryan. I don't believe you purchased the rights to use the .sV sarcasm tag, modifying it with < > does not cut it!!

We'll go ryan.net and go with the object.method of ryan.sarcasm

I was very happy to see us select Underwood...he was billed as a sleeper on a lot of websites...the only one that said he'd be undrafted was yahoo, and that's just a search engine...I think Collins starts at safety then could be used as a nickel/dime back in certain packages...