Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

OFFICIAL Packers @ 49ers - Divisional Round

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by VersusTheMoose, Jan 5, 2013.

  1. PFanCan That's MISTER Cheesehead, to you.

    Member Since:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Message Count:
    992
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +437 / 6 / -0
    Mrad, I won't argue any of your points. But, earlier this season, Matthews was used as a very effective spy. Yes, the pass rush is lowered, but I am surprised it wasn't tried. Also, it seemed that the packers had no idea how to handle the read option. Tackle the RB and Tackle the QB. instead, the packers were trying to guess who had the ball and ended up not tackling either.

    That's basic, isn't it?
  2. WhiteHouseOn3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Message Count:
    46
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +21 / 1 / -0
    Looking forward to (hopefully) getting some guys back next year- Perry, Bishop, DJ Smith, Worthy, Quarless, Saine.. the list goes on. We could only put so many bandages on our banged-up defense.
  3. VersusTheMoose Greatest of All-Time

    Member Since:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,335
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Ratings Received:
    +159 / 0 / -0
    Hard loss to take, we gave up nearly 200 untouched yards to a QB in a playoff game. To me that is not a personal issue, but regardless we lost and they were the much better team. MM needed to go for it on 4th down seeing how we were down 14 points, he will have to live with that decision. Hopefully TT finds some talent in the draft and there are major changes to the D in the offseason.
  4. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Like the guys on IR? :barefoot:
  5. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 6 / -0
    I've re-watched a few of the designed runs and I'm putting more and more blame on Jones and Walden. They looked lost on the touchdown in particular. Those guys do their job, and Kaepernick's damage is more controlled. Not a given the game changes, of course, but it helps.

    On the broken pass plays, it's harder. He ran because the coverage was good and the pressure forced him to do something. Take Matthews out of the picture, and maybe he just picks us apart.

    It's easy for us to talk about it, but I'm not sure we could have done differently. Nothing in a game exists in a vacuum.
  6. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    That was two plays. Clay whiffed a lot more
  7. PFanCan That's MISTER Cheesehead, to you.

    Member Since:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Message Count:
    992
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +437 / 6 / -0
    Yeah, I know. But, but, but.......... I've got to complain about something!
  8. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 6 / -0
    Yeah, Perry and Bishop would have helped today.

    I hate calling for targeted positions in the draft, but a ILB or two might be nice. No idea if the right kind of guys even play in college anymore. Stupid spread offensives making it harder to project to the pros...
  9. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 6 / -0
    Maybe not getting home in the rush, but I didn't see many runs to his side at all until late when he was gassed.
  10. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 6 / -0
    I know, I know. Some people get angry, I get cold and analytical.
  11. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Clay overplayed the RB and Kaep ran past him a few times
  12. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 6 / -0
    That's not necessarily the wrong the play though. If his job was the gap the RB went to or they were playing "high school option defense" aka "Tackle the quarterback, tackle the pitch man everytime," maybe he did the right thing.

    I'm picking on the Jones/Walden combo, because neither runner was pursued and they didn't stay home. I can't see what, if anything, they did right.
  13. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Jones had his moment, but Walden got sucked in on most plays. Maybe they left the QB to the ILB's I dunno, but it didn't work, especially when the ILB were covering receivers.
  14. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 6 / -0
    That's just good scheme on the offense. Walden is a weaker point on our team and so is Jones. Jones did admirally for what he is, but we still need to upgrade OLB. Not surprising, it's an important position in the 3-4.

    Back ILB, finding the right guy is tricky. They HAVE to be able to cover, but it would appear we need a little more thump. Guys that can do both are rare.
  15. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Keep in mind that both are backups, nothing more. Jones 2-3 string. Missing Perry

    UGH ain't that the truth. Especially when you keep picking at the bottom. The guy needs to cover, but cannot hesitate. I almost want to try a FA. We really don't have any good cover men at ILB, Bishop is our best, and that's not saying much.
  16. ExpatPacker No Longer Primed for the playoffs

    Member Since:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Message Count:
    714
    Location:
    A Galaxy Far, Far Away
    Ratings Received:
    +223 / 5 / -0
    Drafting a good ILB in round 1 like Alec Ogletree wouldn't be such a bad idea. But then, we need some real help on the OL too.
  17. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 6 / -0
    Age old problem--good players don't hit free agency. If they're that valuable, teams find a way to keep them.
  18. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Ogletree is too hesitant in the run game. The backs get downfield before he figures out what to do. Coverage can be taught, courage cannot.
  19. mradtke66 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    302
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 6 / -0
    We need some help yes, but not necessarily high-priced help. We will have 5 tackles on the roster to start camp adding no one--Newhouse, Bulaga, Sherrod, Barclay, and Datko. We're cutting at least 1 if not 2 of those guys. Interior guys are typically cheaper--Lang and Sitton both 4th rounders. Give us some younger, better versions of EDS in the 3rd round and later, and we should be fine.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    14,004
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,814 / 52 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    Clay was faked at least twice that I saw..

    To me thats not Doms fault....Thats players execution
  20. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Preach it. If the guys that know them best don't want them, there has to be a reason. How many teams get burnt in free agency every year? Driving up what we have to pay for our players, because they want to pick up another man's trash
  21. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Indeed
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    14,004
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,814 / 52 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    And that makes me go damn it..Maybe Dom shouldnt be faulted to much...He is trying to make chocolate souffle with a blow torch
    • Funny Funny x 1
  22. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    It all depends on how much Ted likes this year's class. I remember wanting Brewster last year, but seems he wasn't worth the pick.
  23. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +696 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Really, you gave him a blowtorch? I got him a wet matchbook. If you can get a fire going you'll be good, but it gets a little hard to light.

Share This Page