You're missing the point completely and putting words in my mouth.
Not once did I say that the Packers D won't be able to stop Ben, first of all.
Secondly, I never said that the Packers haven't played a good QB or good offense all year. My list was a point towards armand34 who said the Steelers haven't.
Packers - Vick X2, Fitzpatrick, Cutler X2, Hill, Stanton, McNabb, Favre X2, Henne, Sanchez, Kitna, Ryan, Smith, Manning
is no more impressive than
Steelers - Ryan, Young, Freeman, Flacco X3, Palmer X2, McCoy X2, Brees, Henne, Brady, Fitzpatrick, Campbell, Sanchez X2, Clausen
As a matter of fact, they're remarkably similar. The only truly great QBs the Steelers played this year are Brees, Brady and Ryan. The only truly great QBs the Packers played this year are Brady, Ryan and MAYBE Vick. I say maybe on Vick because as everybody saw this year, Vick is very ordinary when you have good LBs or DEs containing him and forcing him to be strictly a passer. Everybody else is either a scrub (Hill/Clausen) or "almost but not quite" (Cutler/Flacco).
But that's all besides the point. The Packers have a HELL of a secondary. There are no doubts about that. All I'm saying is that you can't discredit them just because of the schedule they were handed, and, even though they aren't anything special, the same should go with the Steelers. I expect this to be a very close and hard fought game and whichever quarterback comes out on top will have certainly earned it. My overall point being that Rodgers isn't just going to go in there and have a field day with the Steelers D, and that assuming the Steelers are the same team you saw against the Pats or Saints is just as valid as assuming the Packers are the same team as the one you saw against the Dolphins or Redskins -- both are silly assumptions and so is thinking either one of these teams is just going to steamroll the other. I'm expecting a game of legendary proportions come Sunday.
I didn't come here to bash your team. I came here to defend mine.