But that’s the rub, isn’t it? It’s OK to draft guys that had injury problems in college as long as they stay healthy in the pros, right? Of course identifying which group a player falls into is obviously the tricky part.
I understand the comparison to Harrell but I do think there’s a difference between the two. As I remember it, Harrell had a lot more injury red flags when he was drafted than Neal did: Harrell’s participation in OTAs and minicamps was limited because he was still recovering from the injury he suffered his last season at Tennessee. Although Neal was injured a couple of times during his college career, he started 23 games his last two years of college, including all 12 games his senior year and he played in the East-West Shrine game and Senior Bowl. Yes, there were some concerns injury-wise with Neal but I don’t think they were at the same level as with Harrell.
Neal hasn’t been hit by the injury bug since arriving in Green Bay, he’s been mauled by it. As we all know he strained his abdomen and missed the first three games of his rookie season, played a couple of games and then hurt his shoulder and was done for the year. And now of course, it’s his knee. I wonder if part of his problem is he’s so built up from weight lifting. You wouldn’t think so with the advanced techniques available for training in this day and age, but it could be a combination of his genetics and massive musculature.
This is just the beginning of his second year but Packers fans would have to have their heads in the sand not to be concerned. IMO he’s worth keeping around because if he can get and stay healthy, he can be a special player. This is from his biography on the Packers website: “Strong, promising defensive end and inside pass rusher who will look to come back from an injury-riddled rookie season that limited him to just two games…In that small sample of playing time, showed tremendous potential by recording five tackles, a sack and a forced fumble…” Yes, that’s a biased (and out of date) source but I was very impressed with his play during the all-too-brief period he was out there.
It may be best if he gets IR’d this year and begins next season completely healthy (if that’s possible for him). Of course if the surgery went well and he rehabs quickly they’ll keep him active. A completely healthy Neal for the middle to end of season run could be as important as Starks was to the team last year. As I said, I get the comparison to Harrell, but just because Harrell didn’t work out doesn’t mean Neal won’t. But just like the situation with Harrell in and after his second year, it would be foolish for the Packers to depend upon Neal going forward (re: next year’s draft) until he proves he can stay on the field.