Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Marshawn Lynch for AJ Hawk trade RUMOR---coming from a Bills site, opinions?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by matter2003, Sep 14, 2010.

  1. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,659
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,905 / 63 / -12
    Can you provide a link to back that up?

    I checked the bills website and the news feed and neither had anything on that.
  2. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,945
    Ratings Received:
    +864 / 26 / -8
    Link please?
  3. GreenBayTheOnlyWay Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Message Count:
    33
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +2 / 0 / -0
    I'm assuming the poster is referring to the Bills signing a RB to their practice squad. They signed Anderson to the practice squad because Bell (the RB they had on their practice squad) was picked up by the Eagles. A spot opened up and they filled it.
  4. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,945
    Ratings Received:
    +864 / 26 / -8
    Yeah, that makes sense. I remember reading that earlier today, which means it's really a non-story. If they had signed him to the active roster, I could see wondering what the deal is, but signing him to the practice squad means diddly.

    I still think we give Jackson a shot for a couple games before pulling any kind of trigger. I also think Nance will be getting quite a few more carries, since we're doing the whole "Running Back By Committee" thing.
  5. Greatcall Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Message Count:
    1
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    B.Jackson not the answer

    I don't understand why TT hasn't made a move at the RB position. Everyone knows in order to seriously contend for a Super Bowl run, you have to have a "home run" hitter at that position. Sorry, but BJ only has "warning track" power. Grant would have run for 150 yards against the Bills!:write:
  6. Cheesehead625 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Message Count:
    191
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Ratings Received:
    +46 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1984
    sorry the link is fantasyfootballcafe.com its in the forums... the third one down in a thread called lynch deal inevitable. couldve been the practice squad im sorry if so.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    14,004
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,814 / 52 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    So you know for a fact Ted hasnt been trying?
  7. Croak Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Message Count:
    2,511
    Ratings Received:
    +708 / 3 / -0
    Good point. He might be looking, but other teams might be asking too much. Look what the Chargers did to the Vikings (hehe) with the Jackson deal. It's kind of like shopping for a car. You do your homework and go to the dealer knowing exactly how much you are going to pay. If it is over that, it's no deal.

    My Uncle used to fill out a check for the amount he wanted to pay for a car and leave the name blank. Then he would go to the dealership and find the car he wanted. When the salesman would try to give him a high price, my Uncle would tell him exactly what he would pay for it. If the salesman balked, Unc would say; "That's too bad. I had a check filled out for the whole amount right here." He'd then turn around to leave. No salesman ever let him leave the lot. He always paid exactly what he wanted and the salesmen always caved. If the price isn't right, don't buy it.

    Thompson probably has done his homework and knows exactly what he is willing to pay for another running back.
  8. chucknorris101 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    416
    Ratings Received:
    +35 / 0 / -0
    im assuming from the fact that we know the bills dont want to trade him means ted has been asking, but itsnt willing to mortgage any kind of future on the guy. and the bills are playing nah nah nah nah nah.
  9. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,945
    Ratings Received:
    +864 / 26 / -8
    One thing I think we Packer fans as a collective whole don't seem to appreciate is just how good, calculated and disciplined Ted really is. He doesn't over-react, he doesn't over pay and has a knack for bringing in solid talent for reasonable prices. ****, if some of the fans on this board had their way, we would have traded Finley, Jennings, Bulaga and a bunch of draft picks for Revis, Willis and Lynch.

    Most of us don't often agree with most of the moves he makes, which tells me he's making the right decisions, tough as they may be for us to swallow.
  10. PackersRS Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    Ted Thompson will only get recognition when he wins a SB. That's how it goes.
  11. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,945
    Ratings Received:
    +864 / 26 / -8
    Oh, I certainly understand that. He almost got it too, if not for a careless pass in OT.

    Anyway, I get that he'll never get fan recognition for turning us into a team that's going to be able to actually compete for at least 5 years, maybe longer. Rings are all anyone cares about, which is fine. I like rings too. But I also appreciate that, because of Ted, we're set up to be an honest threat to contend every year for the next 5-10 years, as opposed to being a one or two hit wonder like some other teams. ::cough::Minnesota::cough::
  12. armand34 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,800
    Location:
    The Beach, NJ
    Ratings Received:
    +252 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    2003
    i do like TT, and he does a great job, someone will emerge in our backfield, I'm pretty confident about it
  13. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,945
    Ratings Received:
    +864 / 26 / -8
    Someone will emerge if we can get them more than 11 carries and, you know, more than one at a time.
  14. armand34 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,800
    Location:
    The Beach, NJ
    Ratings Received:
    +252 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    2003
    i agree, rhythm is important, they just gotta take a chance on handing the rock off to all three backs, MM loves to throw the ball, even though he preaches balanced offense, he loves to throw the ball
  15. chucknorris101 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    416
    Ratings Received:
    +35 / 0 / -0
    NFL.com today is showing francois LB added to practice squad and campbell T deleted...

    loading an extra LB on?
  16. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,659
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,905 / 63 / -12
    He has gotten some love nationally for letting brett go more recently and he also did win GM of the year so its not like he has gone unnoticed.
  17. Poppa San A few empty spots here yet

    Member Since:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Message Count:
    2,998
    Location:
    Brown County Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +600 / 17 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1919
    New Orleans let Deshawn Wynn go today. Knows the offense and can double for kick returns. (Please NO!!!)
  18. PackerChamps Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    42
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, I noticed they dropped a O-lineman from the squad to make room. Francois had a couple of good plays in preseason. A conspiry theorist might think this is a prep for a pending trade involving one of our linebackers. Although I was under the impression that Buffalo was more interested in an offensive tackle.

    I think the Lynch deal isn't going to happen. Sounds like Buffalo is going to start using him and giving Spiller time to come along more slowly.
  19. FrankRizzo Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2010
    Message Count:
    4,347
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings Received:
    +1,033 / 23 / -4
    Buffalo is being run by the insane clown posse, drunk.
    I feel bad for their fans.
  20. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,659
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,905 / 63 / -12
    Only thing worse than that is having it run by Brett Favre
    • Like Like x 2
  21. Jess Movement!

    Member Since:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Message Count:
    3,118
    Location:
    Killing the buzz.
    Ratings Received:
    +468 / 1 / -0
    :lol:

    Spiller is their most explosive back. BY A LOT. So, naturally, it makes sense to keep him on the bench for much of the game.

    Idiots. This is why they suck.
  22. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,945
    Ratings Received:
    +864 / 26 / -8
    They could be showcasing Lynch in an effort to drive up trade value for him before the deadline too. The trade deadline isn't until October 19th, and their season is dead anyway, so this is the only reason why I could think they would move Spiller to 3rd string.
  23. Incubes12 Bay Harbor Butcher?

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    1,758
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +315 / 0 / -0
    They know the season is hopeless. I think this year is Chan Gailey's year to assess the team. Who he wants around, who he wants to get rid of, and what he needs to address (everything, ha). Either way, I'm pretty sure this is basically an exhibition season to him, until he can get a QB in next year's draft and start anew.

    I've heard rumors that they might throw the season just to get the 1st overall pick. The extra benefit behind this is that if there is a lockout, I've heard the plan is to repeat the draft in the same order 2 years in a row. That's two #1 overall picks 2 years in a row. That's a lot of incentive for the Bills to just scrap the season and make sure their stars (what few they have) don't get injured.
  24. 98Redbird Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Message Count:
    681
    Location:
    Bears Country... UGH!!
    Ratings Received:
    +153 / 7 / -0
    I doubt there will be a lockout.. God I hope not anyways. No Packer football will ruin a year of my life.

Share This Page