Jackson's good, yes, but hasn't proven he's durable AT ALL. Morency apparently suffered a minor injury . . . but from what?? A few hard cutbacks in training camp??
He lasted through last season . . . ok. But even if he's not the starter his reps will probably be doubled this season, further increasing the chances for another three week "minor" injury, hence being significant.
However, I haven't been sold on the durability of them both and believe we will have a "decent" running game at best this year.
I would be more then happy to be wrong though . . .
OK, I get the whole argument of 'Jackson got injured in college' and Mo is injury prone. Sure. It makes sense.
But here's where I beef:
1.) Mo was not injured from 'just making a cut'. That's what MM said he
thought might have been the play. Anyone who knows anything about NFL coaches and reporting injuries, knows that they hate to give any details on extent or specifics of how it happened. They were in shorts, so................. no kneepads + light contact = potential for 'knee contusion', aka bruise on the knee.
2.) If you wanna talk about questionable, shaky, iffy-durability running backs being one of your concerns, please don't bring up Larry "416 carries" Johnson as a potential solution. The guy looks for contact every time he touches the ball. He is just
begging for a season ender. Yeah, he was a stud last year. This year, watch out.