Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Gurley to Vikings

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by GreenBlood, Sep 2, 2012.

  1. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Damnit. I hate developing talented young players for those bastards.
  2. AmishMafia There's cheese under that hat

    Member Since:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,491
    Location:
    The heart of Amish Country, Las Vegas, NV
    Ratings Received:
    +948 / 22 / -2
    Vikings: Brent, Sharper, Longwell
    Packers: Gilbert Brown

    Packers = win
  3. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,942
    Ratings Received:
    +863 / 26 / -8
    Meh, no big deal to me. He had multiple opportunities to stand out here and earn that 6th spot, but he failed to do so. Minnesota can have him. Meanwhile, we have a promising young guy in Boykin and we kept Borel on our practice squad.
  4. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    I would have rather kept Gurley. He was solid in practice. In games, he can't throw the ball to himself. He had the highest special teams value of the three, including a knack for blocking punts. Is Boykin a viable contributor on ST?
  5. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,942
    Ratings Received:
    +863 / 26 / -8
    I have no idea if Boykin is a viable contributor on special teams or not, but my guess is he is. He has to be, otherwise we wouldn't have kept him on our roster. In order to make the 53 man active roster as the 6th receiver, you usually have to be able to play special teams.

    As for practice, from what I've read, Boykin was a genuine standout in training camp, whereas Gurley was mostly under-whelming.
  6. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Still, I have to believe our ST would have been better helped with TG. Oh well.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. Croak Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Message Count:
    2,480
    Ratings Received:
    +703 / 3 / -0
    Poor guy. His mind's been bent by the dark side....
  8. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,565
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,854 / 62 / -11
    I'll laugh when by the end of the season he is their #2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. SpartaChris Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,942
    Ratings Received:
    +863 / 26 / -8
    Here's the thing- We are loaded at the position, so much so that our most veteran player would be a number three, at least, on most other rosters. For Boykin to make this roster tells me all I need to know about his talent and potential.

    I look at receivers the same way I look at running backs. Mostly it's a fungible position in that there are lots of talented guys out there to choose from. This is one position we can afford to take a draft and develop position with.
  10. Poppa San A few empty spots here yet

    Member Since:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Message Count:
    2,978
    Location:
    Brown County Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +589 / 17 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1919
    I was more intrigued by the number of ex-Packers playing in Seattle's last preseason game. 7 or 8 I think.
  11. JBlood Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,770
    Ratings Received:
    +487 / 6 / -0
    Gurley is going from a Championship contender to a doormat. I like Boykin and his 10 and 1/2 inch hands. His hands are nearly as long as the football, and will completely surround the football at mid-circumference. He catches everything within reach, which is more important than blazing speed, imo.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Einstein McFly Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 15, 2012
    Message Count:
    68
    Ratings Received:
    +22 / 2 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1988
    Meh. We got a really good look at him and he wasn't good enough to be on our team. They can have him. The only thing that bugs me is the thought of them getting some advantage from him knowing our playbook, and considering how much turnover there is in the league I doubt it's that big of a deal.
  13. HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,392
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +605 / 16 / -3
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    I HOPE Gurley moves up to MIN's #2. Good for him, but more importantly, good for us. ;)
  14. Jordyruns Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    282
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Ratings Received:
    +82 / 4 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1997
    Doubt he passes Simpson for that second position, I hate the guy but he is beyond a freak explosively.
  15. HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,392
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +605 / 16 / -3
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    The winky-face was supposed to indicate sarcasm. Oh well. The point being, if Gurley is MIN's #2 they will be in a lot worse shape than everybody thinks, which would equate to "really, really bad".
  16. Oshkoshpackfan Mo cheese plz

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,321
    Location:
    Jacksonville NC
    Ratings Received:
    +446 / 31 / -4
    Packer Fan Since:
    1981
    I wish him well over there in Minn., but i hope this does not bite us in the a$$.
  17. VolvoD Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Message Count:
    908
    Location:
    York, PA
    Ratings Received:
    +443 / 8 / -3
    wow, the vikings grabbing a YOUNG packers player? you would have think they would've grabbed him 15 years from now.
  18. ThxJackVainisi Lifelong Packers Fanatic

    Member Since:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,760
    Ratings Received:
    +1,108 / 13 / -4
    Is the 6th WR going to be active on game day if 1-5 are healthy? If not, it doesn’t matter how good a STer he is. One of the arguments against retaining Driver was he will be active on game days and in spite of not starting, (as far as I know) he won't play STs. That's unusual for the 4th or 5th WR.

    Gurley had every opportunity to win a spot this year and he didn't do it. Another UDFA - in his first season with the Packers - beat him out of the spot. The Vikings got at best the Packers #7 WR.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. 13 Times Champs Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,926
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +851 / 44 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    That's the way I see it. :tup:

    And like you I continue to question the Driver situation.
  20. Powarun Big Bay Blues fan

    Member Since:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,829
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +353 / 2 / -0
    Color me not surprised. The Vikings went after Gurley last year, and he took a higher pay to be on the Packers. Can't really blame Gurley he tried and he couldn't get on the team, and though he may not win any championships immediately with some playing time he could end up on a great team through a trade down the years.
  21. El Guapo I Scored A Perfect "1" On The Wonderlic

    Member Since:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Message Count:
    842
    Location:
    Land 'O Lakes
    Ratings Received:
    +355 / 13 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1976
    There is no more true statement than this. When you are undrafted or in one of the last rounds, you have a year at best to prove that you belong and are improving. If you've maxed out your talent at barely a practice squad level, then you're a bust. They move on to the next guy (like Boykin) to see if he can progress into next year's camp. If not then they move on to the next guy.

Share This Page