Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Green Bay Irish

Discussion in 'Smack Area' started by 4thand26, Oct 15, 2007.

  1. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Lets review:

    Wk 1: Phi - 2 fumbled punt returns
    Wk 2: NYG - QB with separated shoulder
    Wk 3: SD - Caught SD still wondering how they beat Chi previous week
    Wk 4: Min - AP touches ball 2 times second half
    Wk 5: Chi - Reality sets in
    Wk 6: Was - 8 fumbles - 6 bounce to GB
    Wk 8: Den - Goal line fumble, Cutler hits WR ankles on game winner
    Wk 9: KC - WR doesnt know to get 2 feet in.
    Wk 10: Min - Playing against Brooks Bollinger...
    Wk 11: Car - No Delhome or Smith, Peppers non-recovery of Favre fumble
    Wk 12: Det - TO prevent Pick for 6, C Johnson first half butter fingers, not continue running over gb def.
    Wk 13: Dal - Owens handing Harris INT. Ware phantom Offsides call.
    Wk 14: Oak - Every bounce...fumble into end zone on punt, int bounce off Oak WR...every bounce
    Wk 15: Stl - Stl tipping ball to Bigby...twice...All of a sudden Stl drops everything.
    Wk 16: Chi - How many INT's can CHI drop? How many tipped balls can GB catch?
    Wk 17: Det - Det didnt make the flight. Substituted GB west, which is why it was as close as it was.

    Would you rather be lucky than good?


    Bitter - maybe.
    Bored - definately.
  2. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    you should flip those.

    Shouldn't you be wondering how the Bears lost to the Vikings? I mean, Hester was amazing, Griese wasn't too horrible, Ced did ok, but...you lost to the Vikings? The Vikings? I picked Chicago in that game too, so that kind of angers me.

    And I thought Peterson killed the PACKERS during their game. Peterson is gonna be a Bear killer for years it seems.

    Bet you're missing Rivera now, ain't ya? Mr. Babbitch(sp) suuuuuuuucks.
  3. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    See above: Best def pack had against Peterson was Childress rushing him only twice in the second half...Missing Rivera? no. Missing a safety without a vagina? yes.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,924
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    Week 1: I will give you that

    Week 2: Non throwing shoulder, besides Eli doesnt play D, which the Pack had their way with

    Week 3: Packers were down, and found a WAY to win

    Week 4: Packers had the ball for about 22 mins and Minny had it for about 8 mins..Look at the Viks 1st 2 possesions again in the 2nd half..

    Week 5: Refs cant count to 12, Barrnett grabs a face mask

    Week 6: Ghost holding call no td, same exact play Olsen got a td on the Pack, refs decided Bubbas wasnt good enough no td
  4. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    We're BOTH. Lucky AND good.
    Your Bears were just plain LUCKY against us.
  5. vikesrule Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,933
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    :thumbsup:

    "Missing a safety without a vagina?".....Bwaahaaa....almost lost my coffee!

    Although 4th, you forgot to mention that the 2nd best Packers defense against the Vikes
    was Ed Hochuli "a.k.a Zebra wearing Cheesehead hat"
  6. IronMan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Message Count:
    3,087
    Location:
    Springfield, MO
    Ratings Received:
    +8 / 0 / -0
    I would rather be 5-1 than 2-4. And I'd rather be first in the NFC than 13th. :wink:
  7. Cdnfavrefan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,624
    Location:
    the unknown province
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    and I'd rather have safety's without vagina's. LOL
  8. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Well.........so would I.
  9. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    4th.....your jealousy is showing!!! :lol:
  10. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    update bump
  11. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Now.....WHY would you want to bring this back up???
    (I can never remember which it is......is it the sadist that likes giving pain and the masocist that enjoys receiving pain?) Anyway......you must LIKE pain! :shock: :lol:
  12. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    If you didnt notice, on the original post, I updated the lucky listing with Denver. I will continue to break it down for you and let you know exactly why the Packers should be 0-7.

    First and foremost, I am trying to show how extrememly lucky the packers have been in each and every win.

    Second, the bears are playing terrible, and i have nothing else to look forward to. I am bored and want to engage in some type of fun discussion.

    Third, I actually dont believe in lucky bounces or bad ref calls. Unless a ref makes a bad call on the absolute last play, you should be able to make up for it.
  13. Packerbacker04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    412
    Location:
    Mount pleasant Michigan
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Haha this is funny. A bear fan talking smack when his team is self destructing and ours is super bowl bound. I am loving the Bears falling apart at the helm. I enjoyed the Lions kicking your *** last sunday and my favorite game was the Dallas game on sunday night where everyone on the bears defense was hanging their heads. I was laughing at Grossman and Lovie in that game. Yeah I know were a great football team and you guys just got lucky against us. We are the best team in the NFC and will continue to be. Why dont you recap all the bear games oh wait they suck so bad that you cant do that haha.
  14. Packerbacker04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    412
    Location:
    Mount pleasant Michigan
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Kinda like last year when the Bears were winning they were the luckiest team ever. The Packers of this year are just a good team. That showed when the Bears got their *** kicked in the super bowl. That game was almost as great as a packer win. Yeah I know the Packers should be 7-0. The Bears didnt beat the Packers at all the packers beat themselves. The Packers will destroy the bears in soldier field kinda like the you lost to Minnesota and Detroit at home. I enjoyed Ryan Longwell making that 55 yarder.
  15. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    I know.....its rather sad, isn't it??? :lol:
    But hey, ya gotta give 4th props for trying! I mean, when a mouse stands it's ground against a rhino, ya gotta admit it takes guts! :D :pop: :D
  16. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Like I said before, I dont believe in luck. The bears beat the packers this year. If you are going to say that the bears got lucky winning in that game, shouldnt you then say that the Packers got lucky in winning their other games?

    The packers are doing quite well this year. They are playing great, as you said. I am sure that NE is very worried about GB - when GB eventually wins the division, wins the conference, and then gets to the SB.

    Yes, Chi got their a$$ kicked in the SB. They were winning after the first quarter, down by 2 at half, down by 5 after 3 quarters, but did end up losing by 12. It was a blow out of epic proportions. I would bet all your money that GB will do MUCH better than that this year. I dont see any AFC team staying with GB.
  17. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Cheesey - you taught me one very important thing last year. There is only 1 winner in the season, and that is the SB winner. Everyone else is a loser. Does that apply this year?
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,924
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    of course, but if rival fans didnt rip on each other what fun would it be?
  18. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Agreed! Smack area is for this purpose! I desperately need a Lion victory over the Gay Bay Fudge Packers so that I can get some help in here. The Bears arent giving me much ammo to fight with this year...
  19. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Yes, it still remains true. Super Bowl 32, we were the losers. Only Denver was the "winner" that year. So i hold myself to the same rule as i held your team to last season. I'm not a hypocrite! But i DO like being at 6-1 MUCH better then say, 3-5! :wink: :lol:
  20. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Can't have it both ways Cheesey man. Either you win the SB, or you are a loser...Your words.
  21. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Thats fine with me 4th! Did i disagree with you? Nope!
    Your team lost last year........but you STILL were better then us.........that was last year though. :wink: The tables have turned!
    And we still have a MUCH better chance right now then the Bears do! Right now, we are NOT "losers!" Only if we get to the SB and LOSE it. That time has not come yet.
    I'll GLADLY ride the Packers "loser" train the rest of the season! And who knows? Maybe we will win! This year isn't over yet! I think our chance this year are a bit better then your teams chances. At least we are still in the running. The race is not over for us yet......(unlike some teams!) :wink:
  22. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    You are 100% right, for now. I also would rather be in your place. However, just following your logic from last year after the bears lost, make sure that you do not distinguish between teh bears season and the packers season, unless the packers win the superbowl.
  23. vike4life Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Message Count:
    600
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    How is AP only getting two touches in the 2nd half considered luck. I consider that poor coaching. I could take a person off the street who knew some football and ask him "If your running back has ran 10 times for 108 yards in the first half how many times are you going to give him the ball in the 2nd half"? They would reply, more than he had in the first half with that kind of success, not 2.

Share This Page