Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Finley should stay...and Packers should pay him his money!

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by PackPackPackers, Feb 28, 2013.

  1. PackPackPackers Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Message Count:
    148
    Ratings Received:
    +39 / 20 / -1
    I am literally laughing at all of the Packer fans that want to cut Jermichael Finley and "save" money. This is just another cheap move by the Packers FO who do not want to pay Finley is money. Why should Finley have to take a pay cut to stay on the team? He is definitely one of the few elite TE's left in the NFL and I think it would be foolish for him to leave. Thompson is driving this organization down the to the ground...I mean how do you expect to obtain great results when you invest in such cheap players.

    Investing into cheap unknown players = cheap results
    Investing into very well known NFL players who are best in the business = very good results, SB wins

    This is a joke...

    Lol, now we have useless Crabtree to replace Finley...
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  2. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,660
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,905 / 63 / -12
    Finley is elite?

    That's hilarious
    • Agree Agree x 5
  3. adambr2 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Message Count:
    490
    Ratings Received:
    +317 / 4 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    I'm assuming that this entire post was joking? Hopefully?
  4. adambr2 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Message Count:
    490
    Ratings Received:
    +317 / 4 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    Because if you're not....Jimmy Graham, Rob Gronkowski, Tony Gonzalez, Aaron Hernandez, Jason Witten, Owen Daniels...there's a few just off the top of my head that are better than Finley. He is not "one of the few elite TE's left in the NFL".


    What was Finley up to when we got that Super Bowl win a couple years ago, btw?
    "Also, Investing into very well known NFL players who are best in the business = very good results, SB wins "
  5. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,660
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,905 / 63 / -12
    I'm pretty sure the post was satire. Or the poster is related/employed by jermichael
  6. VolvoD Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Message Count:
    921
    Location:
    York, PA
    Ratings Received:
    +450 / 8 / -9
    When did Finley help us win a Super Bowl?
  7. AmishMafia There's cheese under that hat

    Member Since:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,505
    Location:
    The heart of Amish Country, Las Vegas, NV
    Ratings Received:
    +965 / 22 / -2
    So, you are apparently not aware of this, but Packer Fans do not constitute the Front Office (FO). Although the Fans 'own' the Packers through 'worthless' stock - they are not in any way empowered to make personnel decisions.
  8. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,660
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,905 / 63 / -12
    The poster also made this statement. Which doesn't seem to lineup with this thread.

  9. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,534
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +697 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    "Trollin' so hard you'd think he's Horde."
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. El Guapo Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Message Count:
    907
    Location:
    Land 'O Lakes
    Ratings Received:
    +387 / 13 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1976
    Yup, worked really well for the Eagles. Investing in good players is one thing. Naively investing in talented yet unmotivated tight ends is also a joke.
  11. Bensalama21 Ben

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,317
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Ratings Received:
    +472 / 10 / -0
    He was on the field with the team DUH!
  12. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    723
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +202 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    He is a top 10 TE who is getting drafted around top 5 in fantasy drafts. That must mean he's pretty good. Everybody likes to rag on Finley, but who is better? Maybe 5 guys in the whole league?

    Personally, if I was building a team the only guys I would take over him would be: Gronk, Graham, Hernandez, Rudolph and maybe Davis if you factor in age.

    I get it, he showed way to much talent and ability early and now that he hasn't lived up to it fans under-rate him even more. He's not that bad though guys. Not even that much overpaid.
  13. texaspackerbacker Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Message Count:
    347
    Ratings Received:
    +57 / 12 / -7
    I agree with your basic premise; I just wouldn't apply it to Finley. Yes, it does seem that the Packers have been cheap at times, preferring cheap second-rate players/projects/diamonds in the rough to proven stars. I'm sure others will point out that we have a wonderful long term winning record that way. I would come back that it could have been even better, but whatever.

    As for Finley, I agree with the majority that he has not been elite. In addition to the guys mentioned above, almost every team has a big SURE-HANDED TE - which arguably, Finley is not. Yeah, he is a matchup problem, he can go deep, etc., but we just haven't seen him use his speed and size for very many big plays.
  14. rodell330 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,150
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    Ratings Received:
    +411 / 72 / -7
    Packer Fan Since:
    1990
    Cutting Finley would be foolish. If TT decideds not to tag Jennings and we lose finley the offense would be average at best. Especially with no legit threat at RB.
    • Agree Agree x 3
  15. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,660
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,905 / 63 / -12
    The offense will never be "avg at best" with Rodgers in his prime.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,470
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +641 / 32 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1959
    According to NBC Sports, Jimmy Graham had 13 drops. Finley had 7. And by way of a team comparison, Cobb had 9 and Nelson had 6.

    On a per target basis:

    Graham 9.6% on 135 targets
    Finley 8.0% on 88 targets
    Cobb: 8.7% on 104 targets
    Nelson: 8.2% on 73 targets
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. JoshuaRHuffman Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Message Count:
    414
    Ratings Received:
    +60 / 0 / -0
    Honestly, if you're going to have a one-dimensional TE, then his one-dimensional ability needs to come in blocking. Otherwise, he's just another WR.

    Packers aren't the only team with this problem. Titans have the same exact kind of TE (Jared Cook). For the most part, same exact problems.

    Goodbye Finley.
  18. Bensalama21 Ben

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,317
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Ratings Received:
    +472 / 10 / -0
    We already have 2 excellent blocking TE's... Why not have a threat that the defense needs to prepare for?
  19. rodell330 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,150
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    Ratings Received:
    +411 / 72 / -7
    Packer Fan Since:
    1990
    That's what i said and?? Jordy Nelson all of a sudden has hamstring issues and don't count on James Jones to score double digit TD's every season. Prime or no prime even the elite quarterbacks NEED weapons.. so yes. AVERAGE at best.
  20. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,660
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,905 / 63 / -12
    Jones is a guy that couldn't get a contract offer recently. He isn't a world killer.

    Elite QBs need weapons? Sure it helps but Brady won 3 SBs without an elite WR.

    Rodgers is too good and the position is too important in this league for the offense to be "avg"
  21. JoshuaRHuffman Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Message Count:
    414
    Ratings Received:
    +60 / 0 / -0
    They have D.J. Williams. Besides, Finley isn't much of a threat. Two touchdowns + zero blocking + tons of baggage doesn't = $8.25 million TE.
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  22. Poppa San A few empty spots here yet

    Member Since:
    Aug 29, 2010
    Message Count:
    3,000
    Location:
    Brown County Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +600 / 17 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1919
    I'd suggest redoing his contract, 4 years $30 (numbers in millions). $8 signing bonus (this years salary) and $1 salary year one. 2 years salary about $2 each with about a $2 and $4 roster bonus. Year four voidable based on performance about $6 roster bonus and $5 salary. Cap hit this year drops to $3, next year $5 and $9 year three [estimated]. He'll probably get more but dropping his cap number for a few years to buy more development time by guaranteeing this years salary should help.
  23. Bensalama21 Ben

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,317
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Ratings Received:
    +472 / 10 / -0
    Really? because when you watch the tape, is that why there is almost always safety help over the top of Finley?
  24. Bensalama21 Ben

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,317
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Ratings Received:
    +472 / 10 / -0
    and zero blocking?


    He chip blocked someone to the ground.. that's at least 2 more blocks than claimed
  25. JoshuaRHuffman Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Message Count:
    414
    Ratings Received:
    +60 / 0 / -0
    Fine. He's a not a zero blocker. He's just a very poor blocker :)

Share This Page