PackOne said:
What about a Brian Brohm will be better than Aaron Rodgers in two years scenario.
Throwing it out there.
I certainly think if you go with Favre this year then you better hope he plays in 09 and you have two years to develop Brohm as your starter for 2010. Somewhere in that time frame, Aaron Rodgers should be traded.
You know it comes down to this.
If the Packers are the slightest and I mean the slightest hesitant about Aaron Rodgers then you go with Favre.
If the Packers believe 100% all the way that Aaron Rodgers is going to be one heck of a QB then you take Rodgers because he's younger.
Personally, I haven't seen enough of Rodgers too make that call but McCarthy and Thompson should have by now and that's why I'd give them the benefit of the doubt on this one. It's a decision that I wouldn't want.