Bagadeez04
Cheesehead
Please don't overreact to this thread title...it's just a question.
Is Mike Daniels considered a player that can be on the field and be effective against the run? Or he just a guy to put in on sub-packages? If he continues to develop well, does he allow the Packers to think twice about giving Raji a blockbuster deal? I say this not because I think it's OK to let Raji walk, but because it seems there are so many players who will be UFAs after this season. They will be looking for areas with depth to cut guys loose (I would think).
Is Mike Daniels considered a player that can be on the field and be effective against the run? Or he just a guy to put in on sub-packages? If he continues to develop well, does he allow the Packers to think twice about giving Raji a blockbuster deal? I say this not because I think it's OK to let Raji walk, but because it seems there are so many players who will be UFAs after this season. They will be looking for areas with depth to cut guys loose (I would think).