Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Big Ben stopped

Discussion in 'All Other Team Discussions' started by CaliforniaCheez, Jun 12, 2006.

  1. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    It's not like this is new.

    Rodman did this with the Spurs.

    Jay Williams with the bulls.

    Kellen Winslow with the Browns.

    And now Ben. And why not wear a helmet? Yeah, it is NOT the law there, but do they have common sense in PA? Jeez. He has such a gift, now it is in question, and it is nobodys fault but his.
  2. 4packgirl Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,415
    Location:
    illinois
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    i just heard on the radio that he had a "severe" knee injury as well. anybody else hear that? they also said he ran into the back of the car & that it was ben's fault. just what i heard on the radio so not sure how true any of it is.

    in a nutshell, he took a risk & now he's paying for it. can't really feel too sorry for the guy.
  3. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    I agree, hot stuff.

    weren't you leaving? I was getting naked, but now I have to get clothes on cuz theres mixed company here. damn you.
  4. 4packgirl Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,415
    Location:
    illinois
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    hmmm...hot stuff?? me likes!! :wink:

    anyhoo, yes i'm leaving tomorrow morning & didn't know if i'd have time to check the boards - lucky for YOU, i'm here!! now about the removal of your clothes... :nono: :moon: :whip:
  5. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    knee injuries were only road rash
  6. calicheesehead Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    742
    Location:
    91214
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    They are reporting now on the NFL channel that he may be ready for Training Camp...or Charlie Batch. Which hurts worse, huh Big3?
  7. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    meh, these reports might be a little too premature. he could be ready for training camp, or he could miss the entire season.

    From what I heard, it was pretty bad. By tomorrow the story will be more clear. Im just disappointed in the young athletes.
  8. yooperfan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,900
    Location:
    Michigans Upper Peninsula
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I don't get it!
    You can only play in the NFL for a relatively few years, you could ride your motorcycle till you are 90.
    Why risk an NFL career?
  9. PackerLegend Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,947
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Um I dont see many 90 year old people riding motorcycles or 80
  10. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    you dont see many 80 or 90 year olds listening to gangster rap...but you will.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    Steelers | Roethlisberger's contract has provisions against non-football injuries
    Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:26:01 -0700

    Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports Pittsburgh Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger's contract contains a default provision that says the Steelers have the right to go after some of his bonus money if Roethlisberger cannot play due to a non-football injury. If Roethlisberger were unable to report to training camp (unlikely), and if the team wanted to enforce the contract's language (also unlikely), and if Pittsburgh prevailed in the case, the Steelers could pursue $400,000 of Roethlisberger's signing bonus and another $5.79 million in bonus payments, according to a person who has reviewed the contract. Of course, the primary issue for Roethlisberger right now is his recovery.
  11. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    no
  12. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    yeah you will.
  13. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    no
  14. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    ignorance is bliss, eh zero?

    (save the 'you tell me' retorts)
  15. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989

    practice what you preach
  16. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    ...that... doesnt make sense.
  17. Raider Pride Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,868
    Location:
    Portland, OR Local Packer Fans P.M me.
    Ratings Received:
    +2 / 0 / -0
    When I heard about the challenge with Ben I was driving to Bakersfield California. It was on ESPN radio and they broke the news that he was in an accident and he was driving a motercycle. I cringed.... Then they said that he was not wearing a helmut and it made my stomach ill thinking of it.

    I was not thinking of Big Ben the very good QB who was a raod block to the Superbowl for my Raiders, nor was I thinking about Big Ben the very good young QB who may beat my Packers in the Superbowl.

    I was thinking of a 24 year old kid with a who had reached a zenith and just killed himself. I was thinking about his mother.

    I was on the hwy 99 and my radio reception was in and out.

    I do not care if he is an idiot. I do not care if he is a bad example to all young steeler fans. All I care about is his Mother is not preparing for a funeral and crying herself to sleep as I type this post.

    Pediction....

    The State laws there will be changed within 6 months, and no one will be allowed to ride with out a helmut.

    Mark my words... There are legislators who are already drafting "The Big Ben Bike Law."

    RP
  18. porky88 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Message Count:
    3,991
    Location:
    Title Town
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    He is lucky to be alive. Surgery went well and he's in serious but stable condition. I guess it took 7 hours for the doctors to complete the surgeries.
  19. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Good prediction. It is an election year. The fake concern of politicians is shameless.

    RP, why take 99 with the construction near Stockton slowing you down?

    My radio always picks up Spanish stations the whole length of the San Joaquin Valley.
    There are only two English stations you are guaranteed to pick up.
    AM NEWS on 1530 in Sacramento and 1070 in LA.
  20. bavpb Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    599
    Location:
    Bavaria, Germany
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    [IMG]
  21. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    I'm sorry the guy got hurt. They said a car turned left in front of him.

    Now.......this is what confuses me.........it's illegal to drive around in your car without a seatbelt on, but LEGAL to drive a motorcycle without a helmet!
    Had he been driving a CAR, and did not have his seatbelt on and got in this collision, i bet he wouldn't have been seriously hurt. But he would have got a ticket for not using a seatbelt. Some laws just don't make sense to me!

    WHY do we HAVE to wear a seatbelt by LAW!??!?! Are the ambulance drivers to lazy to LOOK for the bodies??? (J/K!!! :wink: )

    Now......all that being said........when i was in my early 20's i drove a motorcycle during one summer, without a helmet. I look back and thank God i didn't fall or get in a accident. Have you ever had a june bug hit you when you were going 55 down the freeway??? The hit can knock you off the bike without a helmet on.
  22. bavpb Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    599
    Location:
    Bavaria, Germany
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Or even a moskito. :wink: :lol:

    [IMG]
  23. PackerChick Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    3,143
    Location:
    Ashland, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    its not like that.
  24. DePack Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    3,904
    Location:
    Newark, Delaware
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I doubt the law would change. They just changed it a few years ago. I think it was only 2-3 years ago that you HAD to wear a helmet in Pa.

    Motorcycle lobbyists are pretty powerful. They remind me of a scaled down version of the NRA. Doesn't matter what the cost, their freedoms need to be protected :roll:

    Sometimes you need to protect people from themselves!

Share This Page