Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Bears draft is a joke!

Discussion in 'All Other Team Discussions' started by Philtration, Apr 29, 2006.

  1. Philtration Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,247
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +9 / 2
    I can't take anymore!
    Jerry Angelo is in the middle of the worst Bears draft that I have ever seen. Is Cade McNown still on the board?
    The Bears needed to upgrade their offense in the worst way and this years draft was rated as the best ever for the TE crop and he picks 3 defensive players. Not even the best 3 mind you, just 3 cutesy pie look how clever I am type picks that could have been had tomorrow.
    Unf**king believable!
    :x
  2. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0
    Yeah, that was pretty bad. Why didnt you guys get pope. You had 2 chances to get Pope...

    but no...you got a SS (which makes no sense), a DT (no sense) and CB (makes sense...but that guy didnt play last year, did he?)

    maybe a better day 2?

    all my bears friends are very upset.
  3. Philtration Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,247
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +9 / 2
    I was over at chicago sports.com and they are livid. This comes after Jerry getting stuck with the grand slam breakfast boy.
  4. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0
    i love chicagosports.com

    great bulls coverage.

    lol...man....id like to enjoy your pain...but...it was just real bad...i cant even do it.

    3 day 1 picks

    3 BAD day 1 picks.
  5. Philtration Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,247
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +9 / 2
    Just a very frustrating day for Bears fans man. Winning the division and losing in the first round of the playoffs does not give you the right to take a draft day off. Total arrogance!
  6. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    I agree.
    Things are starting to fall apart already.
    Manning JR should be in jail.
    Tank tore his quad.
    Draft sucked.
    Grossman hurt himself watching the draft.
    This blows!
  7. TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    2,084
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    I really can't believe that trade for their first rounder. Didn't seem like they got anywhere near enough in return.
  8. Miskito Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    377
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    I also agree. This could be the worst draft the Bears ever had. A total disappointment.
  9. rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    All the better for the Packers! :D
  10. big3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 9, 2005
    Message Count:
    784
    Location:
    Novi, MI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    I was surprised the bears didn't spend more on offense considering their offense was terrible and their defense rocked last year.
  11. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    The Bears would come and I would figure a WR or TE and they went crazy on defense. With a defense as good as the Bears they will wind up cutting some talent. At this point it does not seem like a draft good for the Bears.
  12. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0
    the bears didnt even sign the george mason forward who wants to play TE in the NFL. lol
  13. WinnipegPackFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,943
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    I would feel bad for you phil but you did take the division last year !!!
  14. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    GM Sherman is available :)
  15. PackerSacker54 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Message Count:
    709
    Location:
    Oregon
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    The Bears draft was better than you guys think. You will see.
  16. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0
    yeah...now they have talent at defensive line..oh wait...they already had loads of talent there.

    but you got a fullback! thats....something...

    (honestly the only thing you guys got was a rookie unproven CB and a kick returner...didnt address offense at all....retarded GM angelo)
  17. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    9 of 11 starters on last years Def were drafted by the Bears since I think 2000.
  18. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0
    great, now you have depth

    defensive depth > starting offense?

    according to Angelo, thats how he sees it.
  19. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Yeah, the Packers drafted all those proven players and bolstered their offense with the WR from the Powerhouse NorthEast Michigan Tech - they did much better than Chicago.
  20. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    The Bears had a good running game, with zero passing game. They have several WR's coming back this year that didn't play last year. They have a starting QB that showed promise at the end of the year, plus a proven backup. If the Def plays as well next year as it did last year, they will be fine.
  21. SuperRat Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    617
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    They also lack a TE that can do anything but block and their recievers are all either very unproven or over the hill. Muhammed dropped alot of balls last season.
  22. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    The TE's are average at best. Clark blocks well, but is average in receiving.
    The 2nd and 3rd receivers showed a lot of promise at the end of the year. Muhammed had a broken bone in his hand at the end of the year, supposedly explaining some of the drops. Orton was not an NFL qb last year. Grossman looked good after being off for 4 months. Griese gives them a legit NFL qb on the bench.

    Bottom line: The Bears offense can easily improve over last year, and if the D stays where it was, this will be a better team.
  23. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0
    yeah all those healthy WRs are coming back to chicago. All those unproven WRs. Wow.

    The bears offense could improve easilly...if the bears did anything...they arent doing anything.
  24. 4thand26 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,555
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    At least the Bears 2, 3 and 4 receivers are unproven.
    The Packers 2, 3 and 4 receivers are all proven...to be bad.
  25. SuperRat Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Message Count:
    617
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    and you have just proven yourself to be retarded. There aren't any set 2, 3, and 4 reciever for the Packers right now. Must be nice not knowing what you are talking about.

Share This Page