Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

At least we don't have to see the Pack three times on M

Discussion in 'Smack Area' started by Skoalvikes, Dec 20, 2005.

  1. Skoalvikes Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    46
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Madden: "Brett Favre, Brett Favre, Brett Favre, Brett Favre, Brett Favre, Brett Favre, Brett Favre, Brett Favre, Brett Favre"

    So sickening. None of that next year. Did I mention 3-11?

    Go Pack against the Bears next week though.
    Skoalvikes, Dec 20, 2005
    #1

  2. TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    2,084
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    F*ck off.
    TOPackerFan, Dec 20, 2005
    #2

  3. Skoalvikes Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    46
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    Good comeback.
    Skoalvikes, Dec 20, 2005
    #3

  4. TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    2,084
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    I thought so.
    TOPackerFan, Dec 20, 2005
    #4

  5. Skoalvikes Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    46
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    I have to admit, besides Madden kissing Favre's ***, the Packers have been very entertaining on MNF this year. Especially the one I was at.
    Skoalvikes, Dec 20, 2005
    #5

  6. rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    Yeah, if they get a MNF game next year it will be no more than 1. Two at the very most because the Packers will probably remain a popular team.
    rabidgopher04, Dec 20, 2005
    #6

  7. TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    2,084
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    We ain't playing Monday night next year. Sunday night maybe, but not Monday.
    TOPackerFan, Dec 20, 2005
    #7

  8. rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    No, we'll get one because Madden will insist on it. ;)
    rabidgopher04, Dec 20, 2005
    #8

  9. TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    2,084
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    Madden's not on MNF next year. He's switching to Sunday Night I think.
    TOPackerFan, Dec 20, 2005
    #9

  10. rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    Then who is broadcasting MNF? I know it's switching to ESPN, but why would they change broadcasters again?
    rabidgopher04, Dec 20, 2005
    #10

  11. TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    2,084
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    Don't know, but I thought that NBC lured Madden over to Sunday Night Football.
    TOPackerFan, Dec 20, 2005
    #11

  12. rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    Ah, you're right. http://www.ew.com/ew/article/reuters/0, ... 0_,00.html

    I didn't even know that. Too bad Collinsworthless will be on Sunday nights as well. Maybe Al Michaels will get Dennis Miller back.
    rabidgopher04, Dec 20, 2005
    #12

  13. carol k Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    592
    Location:
    wrenshall, mn
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    I doubt if the queens will be on Monday night either. Go Baltimore next week.
    carol k, Dec 20, 2005
    #13

  14. cheesey Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    What it all boils down to is this: There are 31 losers, and only ONE winner in the NFL every year. So, unless you are under the assumption that the Vikings are going to win Super Bowl 40, don't pound your chest too much. I don't even think they will make the playoffs. Da Bears will be the ONLY team from our division this year in the playoffs........and i doubt they will last past the first game.
    cheesey, Dec 20, 2005
    #14

  15. rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    What does this have to do with MNF? :-?
    rabidgopher04, Dec 20, 2005
    #15

  16. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    I don't wanna get cable so no packers on MNF don't bother me none. Even though I think they'd have a simul cast on a local station.
    Zero2Cool, Dec 21, 2005
    #16

  17. Philtration Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,247
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +9 / 2
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    He mentioned it because the Bears will be the only team from the division on MNF next year. :p
    Philtration, Dec 21, 2005
    #17

  18. NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,253
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    I think "F*ck Off" is an excellent comeback.
    NDPackerFan, Dec 26, 2005
    #18

  19. TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    2,084
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    Thanks, I thought so too. Notice mister SkoalVikes isn't here to gloat now that his Queenies have missed the playoffs too.
    TOPackerFan, Dec 26, 2005
    #19

  20. carol k Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    592
    Location:
    wrenshall, mn
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Re: At least we don't have to see the Pack three times

    I was going to post the same thing TO, and neither is easthound. People like that are always around to gloat when their team is winning, but when they lose, they run into hiding.
    carol k, Dec 27, 2005
    #20

Share This Page