1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up/a> or Log In

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

anyone else

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by dhpackr, May 1, 2006.

  1. dhpackr
    Offline

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I wish the Packers kept the #36 & 37 and drafted lendale white and chad jackson.
  2. DePack
    Offline

    DePack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,904
    Location:
    Newark, Delaware
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    I mentioned Saturday night that I wished they would have kept them but I wouldn't have taken Jackson or White. I would have taken Sinorice Moss and somebody else. TT was going to take Colledge with the 36th pick so it worked out for us. When we got Denver's #37 I wanted Moss but.......
  3. digsthepack
    Offline

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Why are so many of you down on the Jennings pick?

    He is totally solid in all aspects of his game...the same could not be said for either Moss or Jackson.

    You folks probably would have taken Hart Lee Dykes over Sterling Sharpe.
  4. dhpackr
    Offline

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    moss = 5' 8"
    jackson = 6' 1"
    i just felt jackson was bigger.
    maybe colledge and white. i read jerry porter is unhappy in oakland. wonder if the raiders would consider kgb for porter
  5. DePack
    Offline

    DePack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,904
    Location:
    Newark, Delaware
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    HEH heh...you said Dykes! I'm OK with Jennings. I just didn't know as much about him at the time. That's why TT gets paid TWICE as much as I do :wink:
  6. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    14
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    TT should have grabbed Chad Jackson.
  7. dhpackr
    Offline

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    jennings = freeman, when i read jenningd bio, i felt he is same type of player that #86 was, so hopefully he will perform well.
  8. Packnic
    Offline

    Packnic Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,454
    Location:
    Salisbury, NC
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0
    nah i like jennings

    small school recievers are where its at.... steve smith, chad johnson, JERRY RICE, florida recievers suck just track stars that benefit from the run and gun offense, thats it .

    these small school guys have to make up for bad QBs, jennings will be more effective than jackson mark my words...

Share This Page