TheEngineer
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 18, 2008
- Messages
- 165
- Reaction score
- 0
Well I woke up this morning and had a thought - right now the Favre-firsters (?) argue that Favre gives them the best chance to win now, while the general premise is that pro-Rodgers supporters want to see what they have in their 4 year investment.
Well, why not split time between the two QBs? Not something a bit ludicrous like in Arizona, but something like this:
In most games, Favre will start and play roughly 3 quarters. Rodgers gets experience playing in about a quarter worth.
In easy games or if a rout is looking likely, play Favre for a quarter and change, and have Rodgers take care of the rest of the game.
This will allow Favre to scratch his itch and allows Rodgers to gain some experience for his appointment onto the throne of Packers starting QB in the following season.
Well, why not split time between the two QBs? Not something a bit ludicrous like in Arizona, but something like this:
In most games, Favre will start and play roughly 3 quarters. Rodgers gets experience playing in about a quarter worth.
In easy games or if a rout is looking likely, play Favre for a quarter and change, and have Rodgers take care of the rest of the game.
This will allow Favre to scratch his itch and allows Rodgers to gain some experience for his appointment onto the throne of Packers starting QB in the following season.