Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

4th and 1 on the 1

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Mortfini, Sep 24, 2007.

  1. Mortfini Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Message Count:
    457
    Location:
    newcastle england
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    i know we won yesterday but it was almost a loss due to sily play calling i know we want to see favre get the record but passing on 4th and 1 on the 1 yard line was a bit of a sily play call any views?
  2. dhpackr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,635
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    just shows MM has zero confidence in his running game!
  3. bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,425
    Location:
    Grand Forks, ND
    Ratings Received:
    +550 / 3
    OR, no respect for San Diego's secondary. either way, i thought we should have taken the FG
  4. dhpackr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,635
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    I really wanted the Packers to run on that play. give the young guys a chance to gain some confidence.
  5. bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,425
    Location:
    Grand Forks, ND
    Ratings Received:
    +550 / 3
    not that it makes any difference now, but you gotta kick the FG and get 3.
  6. MontanaBob Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    814
    Location:
    Missoula Montana
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Where's the damn running game? I know players are hurt, but jeez....42 yards for the whole game? My grandson got 44 yards on his first carry Friday night in a HS game.
  7. wpr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,517
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    There are several ways to look at this.
    1. If you go for the TD instead of the FG and miss it you have SD backed up so deep they can not run all of their plays. With a strong defense you may get a sack and have them punt the ball to you. If you can't sack them most likely you will still get the ball back in good field position.
    2. Almost everyone would expect a run so the pass is a bit of a surprise play.
    3. The run offense has been very poor all year.
    4. The SD secondary was week.
    5. Perhaps it was a chance to get Brett the record but I doubt that was even 4th on the list of reasons to pass.

    If they had made it people would have been saying what a great- gutsy call it was to throw on 4th and 1. There were a couple of receivers in the endzone in the left corner. It all happened so fast I can not remember who they were. I am sure of one of them was breaking open when Brett threw the ball. Perhaps he should have thrown to them instead.
  8. bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,425
    Location:
    Grand Forks, ND
    Ratings Received:
    +550 / 3
    If you take away Favre's kneel down, we averaged 3.7/carry. we gameplanned not to rush against San Diego. We did rush in a timely manner. That's a very respectable average against the Chargers.
  9. Packnic Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,454
    Location:
    Salisbury, NC
    Ratings Received:
    +6 / 0
    i dont think it had anything to do with bretts records... i think the media and fans blow that up.

    i think it had to do with scouting reports. if you didnt notice last week NE destroyed san diegos secondary. we came in with that same game plan and it worked.

    wpr summed it up nicely actually. million ways to look at it. but i dont think it has anything to do with confidence in the run game or brett favres records.

    MM did that last year a couple times if you remember... and if that ball hadnt been tipped... no one here would have questioned it. the ball just got tipped and it wasnt a great pass by favre.... but bubba was open and had it gone to plan it would have been 6 for bubba franks.

    its not a question of MMs confidence in the run game at all. thats just your lack of confidence DH. MM said it was simply in the game plan to throw at them and since NE did it last week and won and MM is the 3-0 head coach... im with him.
  10. vike4life Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Message Count:
    600
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    It was such a poor play call I thought Brad Childress was coaching the Pack on that play. Why did they go out of the shotgun? At least if Favre gets under center and there is a back in the backfield they have to defend the run or pass.

    Regardless, it was a good win for the Pack. I don't expect the Vikings to give your team any trouble next week. Our offense is terrible. Good luck!
  11. Heatherthepackgirl Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,274
    Location:
    Fontana, CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    I thought the play was terrible as well, why throw the ball when you can run it or you could have done a QB sneak to. Our running game has to improve. Sundays running game was alittle better then the other two we played but stil not great..why are we not playing Grant more?
  12. bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,425
    Location:
    Grand Forks, ND
    Ratings Received:
    +550 / 3
    field goal
  13. warhawk Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,922
    Location:
    Gulf Shores, Al
    Ratings Received:
    +38 / 0
    They ran the game plan to perfection. Your NOT going to run the ball down the Chargers throat so why try to? When we did run it we got positive yards and not guys tackling us in the backfield.

    The only reason we didn't run more times for more yards is we were too busy beating the San Diego Chargers.

    Get used to it. We're going to beat all of the teams in our division the same way and it's sure aint running it. We're going to run it just enough that they know we will and then jam the pass down their throats.

    Did you notice what Philly did to Detroit yesterday? They didn't bother running it either. Why would you do that when you can beat them thru the air?
  14. Pack93z You retired too? .... Not me. I'm in my prime

    Member Since:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Message Count:
    4,855
    Location:
    Central Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +23 / 0
    Or the Cowgirls with the Bears.. they at least kept a back in, but they aired it out against that D.

    Sooner or later we will need to run the ball, if for no other reason but to give the Defense a rest. But on this play, they seen what they thought they could hit, instead of challenging Williams in the middle.

    Wells pulled out every trick in the book yesterday to contain Williams... reminded me of Frankie "bag of doughnuts" Winters in games where he was outmatched. IMO, Wells and company deserved a game ball from yesterday. Although the Chargers didn't blitz alot, they have alot of talent up front. Great game, even though we only ran a couple of handful of run plays.
  15. MassPackersFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Message Count:
    803
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    I hate to say it, but a field goal would have bothered me. You either score the TD, get the lead, and kick off, or you don't score the TD and the Chargers are pinned way back on their own 1. Now, in retrospect they completed a lucky pass on 3rd and 8 after trying to get off their own goal line, so pinning them back didn't matter that much, but it should have and usually will. Or we get the TD there.
    The false start is what killed us. And you know what they never showed on the Donald Lee replays? Whether he was touched or not BEFORE The jump. If he wasn't, it doesn't matter if he rolls into the endzone from the 2, it's still a TD.
  16. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0
    I love how the winning hangover doesn't even last 24 hours on this site.
  17. tkpckfan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Message Count:
    326
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    i guess you can call it 4th and 1. more like 4th and 2 inches from the goaline. right there u do a qb sneak. if not that and you wanna pass your at least have a damn rb in the backfield to keep them honest. not lined up in shotgun with no backfield.
  18. evad04 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Message Count:
    205
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    This is an example of hindsight being 20/180.

    I say they did the right thing... because they won. But, yeah, when faced with this decision in the future, at least create the illusion that you MIGHT run it.
  19. Timmons Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 8, 2006
    Message Count:
    622
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0
    Even when they were at 1st and goal from the 1, my instinct was the run it in, like they did later in the game.

    I firmly believe that this was going for the 420 record at home. And that's a bad choice. We weren't running great, but we were generating at least one yard per carry.

    The fourth and goal throw makes me believe that it was for the 420 TD record.

    Regardless, I'm happy today and proud of the Packers.
  20. Packnic Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,454
    Location:
    Salisbury, NC
    Ratings Received:
    +6 / 0
    awesome.


    are we 3-0 or 0-3... i mean really. there is no set way to win football games... or else every team would get the right parts and win everygame.

    you game plan for each team, and you stick to it. and if your right, you win... weve been right 3 times so far.
  21. dhpackr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,635
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    i heard MM on the radio today. i swear he said he has no confidence in the running game, and we have had some mistakes there. meaning the running game.
  22. porky88 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Message Count:
    3,991
    Location:
    Title Town
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    We have a 233 pound RB and we're on the one yard line. It's a no brainier in my opinion. You give Wynn the ball. It was just a bad play call by MM. He did gameplan very well for this game though and is doing a find job as coach of this team. You can't bat a 1000 all year.
  23. jnells Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 11, 2007
    Message Count:
    144
    Location:
    NW Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Even though we decided to pass instead of run on that play, I still had full confidence that we would get the ball back and get the go ahead score.

    I was baffled that we decided to pass there too! For future reference I think Wynn is the man to give the ball to in GL situations, he is a load, and he hits the hole with authority.
  24. MassPackersFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Message Count:
    803
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Does anybody remember what formation we were in when we got the false start penalty on 1st and goal at the 1?
  25. de_real_deal Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 11, 2007
    Message Count:
    591
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0
    Not in shotgun formation, and with no backs i beleive

Share This Page