So I guess because we didn't play Cleveland, Bengals, Miami, Cincy, Seattle, Titans, and Jacksonville, all these stellar top 12 defensive teams, our offense isn't really that good. Oh, and the top rated team, Pittsburgh, we put up like a hundred points the last two times we played them and they ARE right at the top on D year in year out. Oh yeah, and one of those was the SB.
Hmmm. I'm having a hard time with that one. To even start saying that because KC has this "rated D" and the Packers couldn't handle it doesn't even begin to tell the story. EVERY team, no matter how good they are, can't get up for every game. It's just the way it is. We go to their place and I believe they just replaced their coach and all jacked up, and we're about as high as an ant on another one's shoulders. So PLEAASE don't go there and try to take stats from one lousy game. I'll take the body of work over the last few years, thank you.
What fails to sink in for me is the obvious thought process going on here that because the 49r's had a good year, finally, they are obviously now prepared to destroy the world and that the Packers who actually had an even better year are now this overrated offense with a lousy D.
One good years looking like a bottle of whiskey. Just ready to take on the whole bar ain't we?