Rank your QB's

[Packerfan4Life]

Quote:

All I'm saying is give him some time and a little adversity and let's see. I'm just not a Romosexual like a lot of others are.

Webster defines adversity as blowing your first playoff game with a botched hold and having that on your conscience for the entire offseason and having everyone doubt your big game ability and the ability to bounce back from what would be a career damaging incident for some quarterbacks.

2007 season: 35 td's, 14 ints, 3654 yards, 107.7 rating. Through 13 games. I'd say he overcame a little adversity

[DGB454]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DGB454 All I'm saying is give him some time and a little adversity and let's see. I'm just not a Romosexual like a lot of others are. Webster defines adversity as blowing your first playoff game with a botched hold and having that on your conscience for the entire offseason and having everyone doubt your big game ability and the ability to bounce back from what would be a career damaging incident for some quarterbacks. 2007 season: 35 td's, 14 ints, 3654 yards, 107.7 rating. Through 13 games. I'd say he overcame a little adversity

So that's all the adversity he ever faced? Then the kid has never faced adversity.

Give it a rest. I'm not here to argue Romo. I'm not changing my opinion and I don't think you will either.

[Packerfan4Life]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Packerfan4Life Originally Posted by DGB454 All I'm saying is give him some time and a little adversity and let's see. I'm just not a Romosexual like a lot of others are. Webster defines adversity as blowing your first playoff game with a botched hold and having that on your conscience for the entire offseason and having everyone doubt your big game ability and the ability to bounce back from what would be a career damaging incident for some quarterbacks. 2007 season: 35 td's, 14 ints, 3654 yards, 107.7 rating. Through 13 games. I'd say he overcame a little adversity So that's all the adversity he ever faced? Then the kid has never faced adversity. Give it a rest. I'm not here to argue Romo. I'm not changing my opinion and I don't think you will either.

Fair enough. He looked like dogshit today.

[Packnic]

Here you go. Try the Question/Answer game to determine the best Quarterback ever.

1. Has your QB ever won 3 regular season MVPs?:

Brady- No, Manning - No, Romo - Not even close, Favre. CHECK

2. Does your QB hold the record for Most TD Passes, Most Yards Passing, Most Attempts, Most Completions, MOST WINS?:

Brady - No, Manning - No, Romo - Not even close, Favre all the above.

3. Does your QB hold the record for most consecutive starts, despite having triple the injuries (listed on injury report) of the other candidates?:

Brady - No, Manning - No, Romo - No, Favre - CHECK

4. Has your QB won a championship?:

Brady - Yes, Manning - Yes, Romo - HAHA, Favre - CHECK

You can ask questions all day, but at this point in time Favre is the answer to every question.

Therefore the ultimate question "Who is the best QB" - Favre is the right answer.

[de_real_deal]

OMG all this brady love is making me sick. Give Manning Moss, Welker, Stallworth & the rest of that team. Put Favre on that team either. They would both do just as well. Put Brady on the Packers and i'd love to see him being compared to Grossman and all the other crap in the NFL.

Bottom line, Manning, Brady & Romo have arguably the 3 best receivers in the game as their #1 guys. Cant even debate it really as its not a fair debate. If the Pack signs Moss this offseason like we should have, Favre might be breaking Mannings records instead of Brady, we might be undefeated not the Pats and we might be the superbowl favorites instead of the Pats. One transaction changed everything this offseason. Im not trying to start something(TT fans, MM fans, Jennings fans, Jones fans), just talking.